Five more corruption cases against Myanmar's former leader Aung San Suu Kyi have been taken on by a court in the military-ruled country, the latest in a string of cases brought against her since she was overthrown in a coup last year.

Nobel laureate Suu Kyi, 76, is on trial in more than a dozen cases that carry combined maximum sentences of more than 100 years in prison. She has been sentenced to a total of six years in detention so far and denies all charges.

Myanmar's Suu Kyi to hear junta court's verdicts in delayed cases

The following is a summary of the sentences and cases against Suu Kyi, based on information available to Reuters:

• Intent to incite, after her party sent a letter in February to international organisations asking them not to recognise the military government (Penal Code, Article 505). Sentenced to two years in prison in Dec. 6, 2021.

• Breaches of coronavirus regulations during her party's election campaigning in September 2020 (Natural Disaster Management Law, Article 25). Sentenced to two years in prison Jan. 10, 2022, after a two-year sentence in December 2021 on a similar charge.

• Possession in February of unlicensed walkie-talkies and a set of signal jammers (Export and Import Law, Article 8). One case, maximum 3 years in prison. (Telecommunications Law, Article 67). Sentenced on Jan. 10 to two years and one year in jail, respectively, on the charges. The sentences are to be served concurrently.

• Obtaining, collecting, recording, or publishing or communicating secret information that could be useful to an enemy (Official Secrets Act). One case, maximum 14 years in prison.

• Prosecution for "electoral fraud and lawless actions" (status unclear).

• Violations of the anti-corruption law (Sections 55, 63). 10 cases, maximum 15 years in prison for each.

Allegations include:

• Misusing funds from the Daw Khin Kyi Foundation Suu Kyi chaired, to build a home.

• Leasing government-owned land at a discounted rate.

• Accepting bribes totalling $600,000 and 11.4 kg of gold bars.

• Misuse of state funds for lease of a helicopter.