NEW YORK: Pakistan has opposed the awarding of permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to India, whereas, New Delhi also lacks the support of even half of the required number of states at the global forum, citing sources.

India’s dream of becoming a permanent member of the UNSC as Pakistan’s stance was accepted by the global forum for the continuation of debate on the criteria of the membership.

Pakistan has opposed the awarding of UNSC’s permanent membership to India. Pakistan has insisted on a definite period of UNSC permanent membership and its election after every two or five years.

Pakistan gave its stance that India has always violated the UNSC resolutions. Diplomatic sources said that India lacks getting a two-thirds majority in the UN Charter, whereas, the Indian group also loses the backing of the United States (US).

Moreover, India has also failed to meet the criteria for becoming a UNSC permanent member despite claiming to be a secular and strong economy.

India needs the support of 129 member states for becoming a permanent member. Diplomatic sources said that New Delhi has even failed to get the support of even half of the required number of states.

Sources added that Pakistan’s stance was supported by the Arab League and the African Union.

Earlier in April, Pakistan had underscored the need for flexibility to achieve the required consensus among all United Nations member states to overcome the stalemate in the long-running negotiations to restructure the UN Security Council.

“The admittedly slow pace of progress in Security Council reform is not due to any deficiency in the process or procedures,” Ambassador Munir Akram said Wednesday in a resumed session of the Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) aimed at making the 15-member Council more effective, representative and accountable.

The reason, he added, was “the inflexibility in the positions of a few individual states which have come into these negotiations with a pre-determined end goal of fulfilling their national ambitions to secure an elevated and privileged position within the Security Council, regardless of the principle of sovereign equality of states”, obviously referring to the relentless campaign by India, Brazil, Germany and Japan, known as G-4, for permanent seats in an expanded Council.