Contempt case against IG Sindh, others: another judge recuses himself from hearing

18 Feb, 2016

The hearing of contempt case against the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and other senior police officers could not be initiated on Wednesday as another Sindh High Court (SHC) judge disassociated himself from the case.The new two-member bench comprising Justice Muneeb Akhtar and Justice Saqib Hussain Bhatti resumed the hearing of the case. IGP Sindh Ghulam Hyder Jamali and other police officers were present in the court.
Advocate Maulvi Iqbal Haider requested the court to order inclusion of the names of IGP and other police officers in Exit Control List (ECL). Justice Bhatti remarked that why he repeatedly interfered in the case and then refused to hear the case. Resultantly, the new bench also broke down. The case was again referred to Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah for the formation of a new bench and the case was adjourned till March 3.
On last hearing, Justice Karim Khan Agha had rescued himself from hearing the case on account of his personal relationship with the petitioner. Justices Ahmed Ali M Shaikh and Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah of the previous division bench on December 23, 2015 dissociated themselves from the case after lawyers for the alleged contemnors expressed 'no-confidence' in the bench.
The contempt proceedings against IGP Jamali and others were initiated on the petition of disowned Pakistan Peoples Party leader Dr Zulfikar Mirza for besieging the SHC and adjoining antiterrorism courts on May 19 and 23. During the May 23 siege of the SHC, uniformed and plain-clothes personnel had used force to arrest a number of associates of Dr Mirza who, along with him, appeared in court to seek confirmation of their pre-arrest bail in several cases.
Dr Mirza's guards and some of his associates, as well as media persons, were manhandled at the main gate of the court's building. Several vehicles parked in the area and media personnel's cameras were also damaged during the action. The court had framed charges, but the officers pleaded their innocence and opted to face the charges.

Read Comments