Soon after the signing of the 7th National Finance Commission (NFC) Award, a section within the federal government began to voice misgivings about the vertical distribution of resources (57.5 percent to the provinces and the rest to the federal government) in the award. With the passage of time, the federal government has been seeking ways to somehow nullify or dilute the gains that accrue to the provinces from the award. Ever since the PML (N) government has come in office it has attempted to find ways and means to whittle the gains accruing to the provinces or encroach upon their domain of resource mobilization. The first attempt in this regard was made through the very first budget that the PML (N) government presented in 2013 when section 2(22A) of the sales tax act 1990 was substituted by the Finance Act 2013. This resulted in a genuine hue and cry from the taxpayers who consume services liable to sales tax by provinces and litigation ensued in the higher courts. The courts passed interim orders restoring input tax adjustment of provincial sales tax. Eventually, the FBR reversed its decision by issuing SRO 212(1)2014 allowing input tax credit. Now again the Finance Bill 2016 has proposed disallowance of input tax credit of sales tax paid to the provinces by amending the definition of input tax. Needless to say that the concept of input and output taxation is an integral part of the scheme of Value Added Taxation (VAT) and disallowance of input tax will cause a severe hardship to taxpayers.

As if this is not enough, the Finance Bill 2016 also proposes to make the provincial tax authorities FBR's withholding agents for collecting income tax for FBR from non-filers of income tax returns. This is being done by making it mandatory for the provincial tax administrations for not allowing the filing of their sales tax returns by such persons unless the advance income tax of 3 percent has been collected and deposited. This provision of the finance bill raises a fundamental question whether a federal legislation can paralyse the operation of a provincial legislation to extract monetary benefit for the federation. In other words, can the province be stopped from collecting its tax from provincial residents on the basis that they have not paid federal tax? In this instance, it increasingly appears that the FBR has taken its penchant to use everyone and anyone to collect tax on its behalf under pain of penalties to a ridiculous level. It is now seeking to compel the provinces to collect its tax or forgo theirs too. Member Inland Revenue Policy (IRP) Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Rehmatullah Khan Wazir's exhortation during the post-budget press conference that the provinces should impose a lower sales tax as they were getting the major chunk of revenue from the divisible pool is a reflection of the heart burning that afflicts the federal government as a result of the NFC.

Be that as it may, the federal and provincial governments unanimously approved the 2010 National Finance Commission (NFC) award, which is constitutionally required to meet every five years to recommend the distribution of tax proceeds between the federal government and the provinces. Sadly the

No content from Business Recorder shall be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication, or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium.
Business Recorder shall not be responsible or held liable for any error of fact, opinion or recommendation and also for any loss, financial or otherwise, resulting from business or trade or speculation conducted, or investments made, on the basis of the information posted here. Nor shall Business Recorder be held liable for any actions taken in consequence.')"tip1')" href="javascript:void(0)">Copyright Business Recorder, 2016