AIRLINK 183.77 Increased By ▲ 6.32 (3.56%)
BOP 11.26 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.35%)
CNERGY 8.53 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.24%)
CPHL 96.44 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.21%)
FCCL 46.17 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (2.65%)
FFL 15.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.01%)
FLYNG 28.36 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.61%)
HUBC 143.44 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.1%)
HUMNL 13.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
KOSM 5.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.7%)
MLCF 64.57 Increased By ▲ 3.81 (6.27%)
OGDC 214.08 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (1.12%)
PACE 5.97 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.65%)
PAEL 47.02 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.14%)
PIAHCLA 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.51%)
PIBTL 10.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.57%)
POWER 12.12 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.36%)
PPL 171.74 Increased By ▲ 2.06 (1.21%)
PRL 34.52 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
PTC 22.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.02%)
SEARL 92.91 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.17%)
SSGC 40.83 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.67%)
SYM 14.20 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
TELE 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.55%)
TPLP 10.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TRG 66.65 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.05%)
WAVESAPP 10.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.84%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
AIRLINK 183.77 Increased By ▲ 6.32 (3.56%)
BOP 11.26 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.35%)
CNERGY 8.53 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.24%)
CPHL 96.44 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.21%)
FCCL 46.17 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (2.65%)
FFL 15.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.01%)
FLYNG 28.36 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.61%)
HUBC 143.44 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.1%)
HUMNL 13.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
KOSM 5.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.7%)
MLCF 64.57 Increased By ▲ 3.81 (6.27%)
OGDC 214.08 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (1.12%)
PACE 5.97 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.65%)
PAEL 47.02 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.14%)
PIAHCLA 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.51%)
PIBTL 10.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.57%)
POWER 12.12 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.36%)
PPL 171.74 Increased By ▲ 2.06 (1.21%)
PRL 34.52 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
PTC 22.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.02%)
SEARL 92.91 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.17%)
SSGC 40.83 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.67%)
SYM 14.20 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
TELE 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.55%)
TPLP 10.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TRG 66.65 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.05%)
WAVESAPP 10.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.84%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
BR100 12,516 Increased By 159.7 (1.29%)
BR30 37,952 Increased By 532.7 (1.42%)
KSE100 116,901 Increased By 881 (0.76%)
KSE30 35,933 Increased By 326.2 (0.92%)

Sugar has been under the spotlight since last October. And with prices seen firming further in the next few years amid short supply, rising cost of farming inputs and growing use of sugarcane for biofuels purposes, it will remain under focusas the centre of attention, possibly inviting public anger. causing pubic furor as well..
These conditions do not just require a change in how the commodity is managed by the stakeholders, including effective administration by the government, but also require the policymakers to consider increasing both the yield and quantity of sugar. One of such unexplored options is sugar beet, called shakar-qand in Urdu.
According to SMEDAs fact finding mission, sugar beet offers almost two times higher sugar yield per hectare with much less water and other input resources. On top of it, the crop requires a much shorter cultivation period (4-6 months), compared with sugarcane that needs about 12 to 16 months.
In addition, sugar beet offers better margins for both farmers and millers. Gross margins earned by farmers, according to results from model farming, have been found around 13.5 percent semiannually - i.e. 27 percent per annum - while allowing the farming space to sow any other crop during the off-season.
Similarly, since the recovery of sugar from sugar beet is higher than that from sugar cane, the gross margin of sugar mills can increase by using beet as an alternative, if not main, raw material.
Plus, processing sugar beet requires lower heating costs compared with that needed for processing sugarcane, while heat recovery gained through bagasse - the dry dusty pulp that remains after extracting sugar cane or similar plants - is also much higher in case of sugar beet.
Since there is no difference in the quality of white sugar produced by beet and the one produced through cane - they both fetch the same price. This has lured many global players in the beet sugar business, such that more than 20 percent of the world sugar supply today is derived from beet compared with less than 5 percent back in 2007.
In order to reap these benefits, all Pakistani millers will have to do is to add a new beet line to their existing cane sugar mills. As for the government, it should encourage investors in the private sector to initiate sugar beet projects while also making ancillary farming arrangements.


===========================================================================================
COMPARATIVE FARMING REQUIREMENTS
===========================================================================================
Months Days Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug
===========================================================================================
Sugarcane
Planting 3 90
Growing Period 13 390
Harvest 4 120
Sugar Beet (Winter)
Planting 1.5 45
Growing Period 7 210
Harvest 2 60
Sugar Beet(Summer)
Planting 1.5 45
Growing Period 4 120
Harvest 1.5 45
===========================================================================================

Source: Beet-Tech Project - SMEDA

Comments

Comments are closed.