AGL 38.20 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.13%)
AIRLINK 129.30 Increased By ▲ 4.23 (3.38%)
BOP 7.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (14.6%)
CNERGY 4.66 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.72%)
DCL 8.35 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.56%)
DFML 38.86 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.07%)
DGKC 82.20 Increased By ▲ 4.43 (5.7%)
FCCL 33.64 Increased By ▲ 3.06 (10.01%)
FFBL 75.75 Increased By ▲ 6.89 (10.01%)
FFL 12.83 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (8.18%)
HUBC 110.72 Increased By ▲ 6.22 (5.95%)
HUMNL 14.03 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4%)
KEL 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.26%)
KOSM 7.69 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (7.25%)
MLCF 40.08 Increased By ▲ 3.64 (9.99%)
NBP 72.51 Increased By ▲ 6.59 (10%)
OGDC 189.18 Increased By ▲ 9.65 (5.38%)
PAEL 25.74 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (5.36%)
PIBTL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.22%)
PPL 153.45 Increased By ▲ 9.75 (6.78%)
PRL 25.52 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (4.93%)
PTC 17.92 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (9.27%)
SEARL 82.50 Increased By ▲ 3.93 (5%)
TELE 7.63 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (5.68%)
TOMCL 32.50 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.66%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.74 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (3.78%)
TRG 56.01 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2.47%)
UNITY 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (4.91%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,659 Increased By 569.2 (5.64%)
BR30 31,331 Increased By 1822.5 (6.18%)
KSE100 99,269 Increased By 4695.1 (4.96%)
KSE30 31,032 Increased By 1587.6 (5.39%)

More than 300 claim documents, checked by the scrutiny committee, formed in the Export Promotion Bureau (EPB) to conduct internal audit of the freight subsidy claims, were found defective for one reason or another.
The issue on freight subsidy was discussed in a meeting of the steering committee held under the chairmanship of EPB Vice-Chairman.
The audit was conducted to ensure that the payments were made to the genuine exporters. In most of the cases, the objection to these claims was submission of insufficient documents, required under the procedure of the freight subsidy scheme.
This necessitated sending back such claims to the exporters through their banks, for completion and resubmission, involving a lot of time.
It was, therefore, decided in the EPB to allow payment of these claims against receipt of necessary indemnity/bank guarantee from the processing banks. Most of the banks are submitting the required indemnity to the National Bank of Pakistan (NBP) and getting their claims processed.
The meeting further decided that the NBP, FTC branch, in consultation with the State Bank of Pakistan and processing banks, would suggest a time bound guarantee meeting the requirements of EPB/NBP and also address the concerns of the processing banks.
The decision was taken when it was brought to the notice of the EPB that some banks are reluctant to provide necessary indemnity against pending claims of 2002-03 of their exporters, mainly due to open-ended nature of the guarantee prescribed.
The limitation of the freight subsidy by the government to the first port of call of vessels under the new freight subsidy procedure (2003-04) was also discussed.
The meeting reviewed in detail the issue involved in providing freight subsidy to the land-locked countries.
It was argued that the freight subsidy be given to all eligible countries irrespective of their location as provided in the 2002-03 trade policy, continued for 2003-04.
That argument was countered by the views that the administration of the freight subsidy for the land-locked countries was difficult and there were possibilities of misuse.
The matter was referred to the technical committee on freight subsidy for further examination of the issue and submission of a report to the steering committee.
The procedure for freight subsidy for 2003-04 also provides freight subsidy provision on export through the land route, where the freight subsidy is to be provided according to the benchmark freight rates, established by the EPB for such destinations.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.