AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 129.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.36%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.05%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-3.02%)
DCL 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-4.36%)
DFML 40.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.09%)
DGKC 80.96 Decreased By ▼ -2.81 (-3.35%)
FCCL 32.77 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 74.43 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-1.38%)
FFL 11.74 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.35%)
HUBC 109.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-0.88%)
HUMNL 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-5.56%)
KEL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.48%)
KOSM 7.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-8.1%)
MLCF 38.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-2.99%)
NBP 63.51 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (5.34%)
OGDC 194.69 Decreased By ▼ -4.97 (-2.49%)
PAEL 25.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.53%)
PIBTL 7.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.52%)
PPL 155.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.56%)
PRL 25.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-3.52%)
PTC 17.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-5.2%)
SEARL 78.65 Decreased By ▼ -3.79 (-4.6%)
TELE 7.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-5.42%)
TOMCL 33.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-2.26%)
TPLP 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-7.28%)
TREET 16.27 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-6.87%)
TRG 58.22 Decreased By ▼ -3.10 (-5.06%)
UNITY 27.49 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.72%)
BR100 10,445 Increased By 38.5 (0.37%)
BR30 31,189 Decreased By -523.9 (-1.65%)
KSE100 97,798 Increased By 469.8 (0.48%)
KSE30 30,481 Increased By 288.3 (0.95%)

The Federal Tax Ombudsman, Justice Saleem Akhtar, has asked the Peshawar Collector of Sales Tax (Refund) to decide a refund claim within three weeks as no action was taken on the application for more than six months.
The complainant, Amir Rauf, Proprietor of AYS Fridge Co Electronics, Peshawar, submitted that application for refund of Rs 383,000 was given on May 27, 2003, supported with documents ie invoices and sales tax returns.
Since there was no response, the complainant filed a representation on 26.9.2003 but without any result. The department had been evading payment on one pretext or the other.
During hearing, the department did not deny the allegation and offered no comment. The FTO held this was a clear admission of the facts.
The complainant had further pointed out that he had filed all the supportive documents and that he was not informed of any deficiency of documents.
The order reads: There was complete silence on the part of department if any supportive documents were asked for. The department never pleaded that it had required the complainant in writing to submit the requisite documents for processing and deciding the claim.
The order noted that the department's admission proved that the complainant had filed application with relevant documents, which were kept in the file without any action. Maladministration is fully established.
The order added that if the documents filed by the complainant are not available on record, the complainant should file them within three weeks with supportive documents and the claim for refund should be decided within two weeks of the filing of documents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.