AGL 39.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-1.2%)
AIRLINK 130.28 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (0.95%)
BOP 6.82 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.04%)
CNERGY 4.69 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (4.45%)
DCL 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DFML 41.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.56%)
DGKC 81.50 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.67%)
FCCL 32.84 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.21%)
FFBL 74.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.3%)
FFL 11.85 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.94%)
HUBC 109.59 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.01%)
HUMNL 14.26 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (3.71%)
KEL 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.38%)
KOSM 7.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.17%)
MLCF 38.61 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
NBP 65.25 Increased By ▲ 1.74 (2.74%)
OGDC 193.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-0.61%)
PAEL 25.75 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.16%)
PIBTL 7.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.54%)
PPL 154.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-0.87%)
PRL 25.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.93%)
PTC 17.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 80.10 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (1.84%)
TELE 7.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.76%)
TOMCL 33.77 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.12%)
TPLP 8.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
TRG 57.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.32%)
UNITY 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.72%)
BR100 10,618 Increased By 172.7 (1.65%)
BR30 31,212 Increased By 22.6 (0.07%)
KSE100 99,091 Increased By 1292.4 (1.32%)
KSE30 30,949 Increased By 468.3 (1.54%)

The Delhi High Court on Friday vacated the interim injunction against the Ten Sports for the supply of feed channel to Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt Ltd after the Multi System Operator (MSO) said it was not pressing it since the Indo-Pakistan cricket series was being telecast on Doordarsan as per the Supreme Court order.
Justice R C Chopra vacated the March 12 interim order by which the Dubai-based channel and its distributor was directed to continue with the supply of feed channel to the MSO.
The interim order was passed on an application by the Hathway Cable alleging that Ten Sports and its distributor, Cable Distribution Network (CDN), had threatened the disconnection of the supply of feed channel and had demanded exorbitantly enhanced subscription fee which was four times the fee existing under contractual agreement.
The court fixed April 7 to hear the contention of the parties on the main suit.
In the suit, Hathway has contended that by the contractual agreement of May 1, 2003, it was entitled to receive the feed channel against the payment of Rs 5.08 lakh per month till March 31.
However, Ten Sports, in its reply to the suit, had said the agreement between the parties was a determinable contract and the distributor was entitled to terminate that in the event of a breach of a warranty.
The channel has contended that the subscription fee was based on the basis of a per-subscriber-per-month charge of Rs 14 multiplied by a subscriber base of 36,300 subscribers.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.