AGL 40.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 128.21 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.4%)
BOP 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.12%)
CNERGY 4.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.09%)
DCL 9.10 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (3.53%)
DFML 41.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
DGKC 86.60 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (0.94%)
FCCL 32.74 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.77%)
FFBL 64.56 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.83%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.18 Increased By ▲ 1.41 (1.27%)
HUMNL 14.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.13%)
KEL 5.10 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.51%)
KOSM 7.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.54%)
MLCF 40.72 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.49%)
NBP 61.50 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.74%)
OGDC 195.80 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (0.48%)
PAEL 27.69 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.65%)
PIBTL 7.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.69%)
PPL 153.61 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (0.71%)
PRL 26.65 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.26%)
PTC 16.38 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.74%)
SEARL 84.50 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.43%)
TELE 7.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.51%)
TOMCL 36.80 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.55%)
TPLP 8.90 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.77%)
TREET 17.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-3%)
TRG 58.90 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.48%)
UNITY 28.10 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (4.62%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.17%)
BR100 10,130 Increased By 129.4 (1.29%)
BR30 31,334 Increased By 331.9 (1.07%)
KSE100 95,109 Increased By 916.9 (0.97%)
KSE30 29,529 Increased By 328 (1.12%)

The readers are well aware that the banking system was switched over to the Islamic banking w.e.f January 1985.
Under the Banking Companies Ordinance 1962, SBP in its instruction to all Banking Companies, DFI's had directed that no overdue panel interest or markup on markup shall be charged by the banking companies DFI's from January 1985. Attention is drawn to BCD Circular letter No 32 of 26th November 1984 and the instructions contained therein are very clear.
At the same time, a reference is also made to Circular No 13 dated 20th June 1984 regarding the elimination of (RIBA) from the banking system.
Despite these clear instructions, violation is being made by all banks, including the IDBP. No banking company has applied these instructions in letter and spirit. What they do is that they create separate loans for the non-paid markup without the consent of the borrower.
The markup on markup is hidden by way of "capitalisation" a clear deviation from the Islamic banking law.
These financial institutions, in order to declare fictitious profits are involved in this irregular practice, resulting in a large number of industrial units being closed and thousands of employers rendered jobless, while a large number of cases are pending in banking courts.
Most of the counsels engaged in the cases are either ignorant of the Banking law and practice or misleading their clients in fighting these cases at various levels. I feel that if the markup on markup should be disallowed by the honourable courts, a sizeable amounts shall be recovered from the, borrowers.
Let the banks abandon their unlawful demands of markup on markup, under the garb of "capitalisation."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.