AGL 37.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.92%)
AIRLINK 128.50 Increased By ▲ 3.43 (2.74%)
BOP 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (6.57%)
CNERGY 4.62 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.82%)
DCL 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (7.46%)
DFML 38.60 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (3.37%)
DGKC 81.00 Increased By ▲ 3.23 (4.15%)
FCCL 32.60 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (6.61%)
FFBL 74.29 Increased By ▲ 5.43 (7.89%)
FFL 12.33 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (3.96%)
HUBC 109.32 Increased By ▲ 4.82 (4.61%)
HUMNL 13.90 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.04%)
KEL 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (8.82%)
KOSM 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.46%)
MLCF 38.25 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (4.97%)
NBP 70.75 Increased By ▲ 4.83 (7.33%)
OGDC 187.85 Increased By ▲ 8.32 (4.63%)
PAEL 25.13 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (2.87%)
PIBTL 7.39 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (3.36%)
PPL 151.28 Increased By ▲ 7.58 (5.27%)
PRL 25.26 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (3.87%)
PTC 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (4.21%)
SEARL 82.74 Increased By ▲ 4.17 (5.31%)
TELE 7.52 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.16%)
TOMCL 32.58 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.91%)
TPLP 8.48 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (4.31%)
TREET 16.49 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (2.23%)
TRG 56.54 Increased By ▲ 1.88 (3.44%)
UNITY 27.85 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.27%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,536 Increased By 446.5 (4.43%)
BR30 30,948 Increased By 1438.8 (4.88%)
KSE100 98,284 Increased By 3709.5 (3.92%)
KSE30 30,665 Increased By 1220.4 (4.14%)

Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO), while disposing of a complaint lodged by a foreign company, has directed the Revenue Officials to resolve the issue of refund of the amount claimed by the complainant company within 30 days.
The complainant M/s Monolite International had approached the FTO against the respondent officials for non-issuance of refund amounting to Rs 7,658,625 allegedly received by respondent customs collector in the head of custom duty. In this regard the Addl. Auditor General had advised CBR to issue a certificate to the importer that the amount of Income Tax and Sales Tax was received by the CBR/Customs.
He further held that the CBR could also issue instructions to the Income Tax and Sales Tax Departments for accepting of Income Tax payment proof of the importer for refund, if any, to be made from the current financial year, as accounts of the previous year have since been closed.
The Complainant Company therefore, prayed to the court to direct the respondent officials to approve the refund amount in question and issue to the complainant in accordance with the law.
The court, after hearing the complainant counsel at length disposed of the complaint.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2005

Comments

Comments are closed.