A New York Times reporter, under pressure to explain a previously undisclosed conversation with a top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, made a second appearance on Wednesday before the federal grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA operative's identity.
Times reporter Judith Miller made no comment as she entered the federal courthouse after turning over notes detailing her June 23, 2003, conversation with Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby. An entry in her notes referred to Joseph Wilson, covert CIA operative Valerie Plame's diplomat husband.
That conversation could help federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald establish whether the White House started targeting Wilson and possibly his wife in the weeks before Wilson publicly accused the Bush administration of twisting intelligence on Iraq.
During that period, reports had surfaced of a CIA-funded trip Wilson took to Africa in which he investigated administration charges about Iraqi attempts to buy nuclear materials and found they had little foundation.
The leak investigation has spotlighted freedom-of-press issues and the Bush administration's aggressive efforts to defend its Iraq policy against critics.
In a memo to New York Times staff on Tuesday, Executive Editor Bill Keller said Miller, who first testified before the grand jury on September 30 after spending 85 days in jail, may not yet be clear of legal jeopardy.
President George W. Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, has also been summoned to make a fourth appearance before the grand jury later this week, and prosecutors have told him they can make no guarantees he will not be indicted.
During her September 30 grand-jury appearance, Miller testified about her two previously disclosed conversations with Libby - on July 8 and July 12, 2003.
It is unclear how Fitzgerald first learned about the June 23, 2003, conversation.
Legal sources close to Miller said she discovered the notes after she testified.
According to a National Journal report, in two appearances before the federal grand jury, Libby did not disclose the June 23 conversation with Miller. Nor did Libby disclose the conversation when he was twice interviewed by FBI agents.
Fitzgerald has not indicated whether he intends to bring indictments in his nearly two-year-old investigation into who leaked Plame's identity and whether any laws were broken.
Fitzgerald could bring charges against officials for knowingly revealing the identity of an undercover CIA operative, but some lawyers involved in the case say his focus may be shifting to conspiracy, perjury and obstruction-of-justice charges.
Libby's June 23, 2003, conversation with Miller could bolster a conspiracy or perjury case because the conversation was not initially disclosed and suggests a pre-emptive effort to discredit Wilson, those lawyers say.
Wilson asserts that administration officials outed his wife, damaging her ability to work undercover, to discredit him for criticising Bush's Iraq policy in 2003 after Wilson made a CIA-funded trip to investigate whether Niger helped supply nuclear materials to Baghdad.
Comments
Comments are closed.