AIRLINK 184.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.21%)
BOP 9.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.42%)
CNERGY 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.55%)
FCCL 36.95 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.85%)
FFL 14.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.55%)
FLYNG 24.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.76%)
HUBC 126.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.17%)
HUMNL 12.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.68%)
KEL 4.36 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.93%)
KOSM 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.16%)
MLCF 42.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.44%)
OGDC 199.45 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (2.05%)
PACE 6.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.91%)
PAEL 38.10 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.37%)
PIAHCLA 16.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.53%)
PIBTL 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.51%)
POWER 9.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
PPL 169.25 Increased By ▲ 1.36 (0.81%)
PRL 33.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.85%)
PTC 22.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
SEARL 102.74 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-1.18%)
SILK 1.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-10.08%)
SSGC 36.10 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.42%)
SYM 17.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.55%)
TELE 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
TPLP 11.74 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.95%)
TRG 66.39 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.35%)
WAVESAPP 12.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.74%)
WTL 1.54 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.32%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
BR100 11,592 Increased By 22.6 (0.19%)
BR30 34,104 Increased By 70 (0.21%)
KSE100 110,821 Increased By 519.4 (0.47%)
KSE30 34,596 Increased By 209.2 (0.61%)

The Finance Division, Government of Pakistan, has denied that the employment survey report was ever discussed in a meeting of the ECC. However, the minutes of the meeting held on February 10, 2006 reflect that the ECC was indeed briefed about the labour survey under way.
A press release of the Finance Division says: "A news item appeared in Daily Business Recorder dated March 4, 2006 under the caption 'ECC Doubts poverty, jobs data'. This news item claims that Economic Adviser to Finance Ministry, Dr Ashfaque Hasan Khan, and Additional Secretary Incharge of Statistics Division briefed the ECC about the Survey Reports in its last meeting.
This news item also claims that fingers were raised at credibility of data which is now being examined by the Planning Commission. This news item also suggests that unemployment in the country has in fact increased by 6.9 percent.
"This news item is not based on facts. Neither Dr Ashfaque Hasan Khan nor Additional Secretary Incharge Statistics Division gave any briefing to the ECC about the poverty estimates.
The Federal Bureau of Statistics (FBS) has completed the Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement (PSLM) Survey and the raw data were sent to the Centre for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution (CRPRID) for the estimate of poverty and its analysis. This Centre has been established by the UNDP and is located in the Planning Commission.
The Centre has estimated the poverty from the PSLM survey and provided the number to the Planning Commission (PC) which presented the estimates of poverty in the National Economic Council meeting held on February 28, 2006. In the last ECC meeting the Prime Minister also briefed the Members of the ECC on the estimates of poverty in his opening remarks, and then the normal agenda items were taken for discussion.
The question of raising finger on the credibility of data and that the PC is going to examine the same estimate is totally unfounded and baseless. The reporter has also mixed up the numbers pertaining to job creation and came out with a number which, according to him, suggests that the unemployment 'has in fact increased by 6.9 percent'.
"The factual position is that according to Pakistan Labour Force Survey 2003-04, the number of employed people in Pakistan was 42.01 million and according to Labour Force Survey conducted during the 1st quarter of the current fiscal year (July-September 2005), the number of employed people increased to 47.55 million. Therefore, 5.54 million new jobs were created during this period and the rate of unemployment stood at 6.9 percent. This type of baseless story does not serve any useful purpose."
Business Recorder reporter Mushtaq Ghumman says the news item reflects the minutes of the meeting of the ECC issued as case No ECC-17/2/2006 dated 10-2-2006.
Para 6 of the meeting states:
"A"" In addition to the above, the Economic Adviser, Finance Division, and the Acting Secretary, Statistics Division, briefed the ECC that the Statistics Division has conducted Labour Survey on quarterly basis for the financial year 2005-06. It is for the first time that this survey has been conducted on quarterly basis; data is based on 9000 households' survey. Earlier this survey was done on two-yearly basis: the survey 2003-04 was based on 36,000 households. Such surveys indicate employment and unemployment level and help taking appropriate measures for alleviation of poverty."
Further, Para 8 of the minutes issued says:
"B""ECC was informed that during 2003-04 the total employment in the country in the first quarter of the financial year 2005-06 was 42.01 million. The total employment during financial year 2003-04 was 47.55 million. An additional employment of 5.54 million has been created. The trend indicates creation of 6.99% in the employment rate in the country."
It is possible that the two figures relating to 2005-06 and 2003-04 were wrongly recorded in the minutes. However, the scribe himself has pointed to this error in the news item.
Para 10 of the minutes states:
"C"On a question about the creditability of the data, the ECC was informed that during the process of planning of the surveys, preparation of questionnaire form, tabulation, and compilation of the draft report, all stakeholders including the representatives of International, Financial Institutions, NGOs, Academia, and Government Ministries/Departments were consulted in order to provide credibility to the data being compiled, and at times international experts were also invited to provide on the surveys."
From the above it is obvious that some cabinet member in the ECC did raise the question of credibility which was adequately responded to by Additional Secretary Statistics Division.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.