AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

Tobacco companies could move a step closer to reducing their settlement payments to 46 states by billions of dollars when an arbitrator determines what caused them to lose market share.
The next annual payment from Big Tobacco in the landmark 1998 settlement - about $6.5 billion - is due April 15. But several cigarette makers are seeking to reduce that payment by about $1.2 billion due to declining sales.
Much is at stake in the decision, because it could set a precedent for payment reduction demands in subsequent years by the tobacco companies, which through 2005 saw a steady decline in cigarette sales to their lowest level since 1951.
The decision, which may not be announced until Tuesday, could have negative implications for $31.5 billion in bonds backed by tobacco payments sold by states, cities and counties.
The Brattle Group, the arbitrator hired by the state attorneys general and the tobacco companies, is expected to decide whether to affirm an earlier determination that the costs associated with the "Master Settlement Agreement" were a "significant factor" that caused a 2 percent market share loss in 2003 for tobacco firms that participated in it.
But if the states lose, they can be expected to fight back in court. They plan to argue that they diligently enforced statutory requirements to collect escrow payments from companies that did not sign the accord. If they can prove this, tobacco firms would not be entitled to reduce their payments.
Tobacco firms participating in the landmark $206 billion settlement are allowed to reduce their payments if they suffer an annual market share loss of 2 percent versus the base year of 1997.
The accord, aimed at making cigarette makers reimburse states for the billions of dollars they spend treating ailing smokers, raises costs for the participating manufacturers.
Non-signing tobacco companies, often discounters, grabbed 8 percentage points of market share between 1997, the year before the pact was sealed, and 2003, according to a tobacco company official who requested anonymity.

Copyright Reuters, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.