AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

Recently, circular Letter C. No 1 (17) WHT/91-Pt, dated January 23rd, 2006, has been issued by the Central Board of Revenue, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, under which it has been specifically clarified that all the NPOs/NGOs/AOPs "Registered under any law" are covered by section 153(9)(c) for the "prescribed person" and are legally obliged to deduct withholding tax while making any payment.
This clarification is totally in contradiction to the earlier clarification, dated 29-8-2002 under which it was clarified.
The provisions of law are clear and explicit "And define the AOP created by law/under law, such AOPs are very few in Pakistan".
But by virtue of the clarifications dated 23-01-2006, all the partnerships registered under the Partnership Act, have been brought within the definition of the "prescribed person", the CBR has now powers to issue any clarification, which is contrary to the provisions of law. Such clarification issued has no legal support and always play havoc with the assessees and they are put under mental torture and monetary losses.
In this context, I refer to the clarification issued earlier in 1986, for chargeability WWF upon income worked out for payments under the 80-C. After this clarification, thousands of orders were passed, demand for billions of rupees created. The assessees approached the Appellate Authorities, such as the Hon. I.T.A.T, who upheld, that no WWF is chargeable upon notional income, as it is not income assessed, as required by Section 4(4) of the W.W.F Act. The department has to waste a good amount for filing appeals before the Honourable High Court, and after failure before the Honourable High Court, the department preferred, appeals before the Supreme Court of Pakistan, which have now been termed as frivolous, and withdrawn. Meanwhile assessees remain under the sword hanging over their heads, for nothing but illegal clarifications issued by the CBR.
This clarification, dated 23.01.2006, shall also have some effect, and thousands of AOP's who do not fall within the ambit of the definition for prescribed persons, as per provisions of law, shall be subjected to torture by virtue of this clarification issued, illegal and without powers. To avoid complications, and the sufferings to be faced by the assessees and department, it is requested that the Chairman CBR should immediately take notice of the clarification, which is totally contrary to the provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and the notification relating to the withdrawal of the clarification be issued immediately.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.