AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

We are a nation with a very short "attention span"! Only a few months back, the ECC had issued a directive to ensure that our precious gas was used in an efficient process (Combined Cycle Power Plants and Cogeneration).
Whether gas was required for power plants or for industrial process, it should have been normal to expect that only efficiency and economics would be the deciding factor.
The latest decisions on the fuel policy (news item, May 2) seem to be changing all that once again. It is reported that the "Government has decided not to provide gas to the cement sector in the future and to divert additional gas supplies from power stations after 2011".
Why are we changing once again to the good old days of the "golden goose" furnace oil import? Obviously a lot of people stand to make a lot of money with furnace oil import as was evident after the 1994, energy policy.
Natural gas is the fuel of choice everywhere in the world and we want to avoid this fuel and select the worst possible option - both economically and with the most serious pollution hazard! Also, since the fuel is very corrosive, the cost of major equipment is very high, with further loss through low efficiency. Why should we select a fuel, which is costly, and also increases the equipment cost considerably?
It is common knowledge that large combined cycle power plants, operating on clean fuel (natural gas, naphtha (kerosene), LPG) cost only $400-500 per kW capacity. The same power plant suitable for furnace oil or even LDO would cost nearly double and with lesser efficiency! And we still want to advocate power plants based on furnace oil since this fuel has a big margin to "negotiate" whereas gas fuel prices are fixed on country basis.
Energy conservation and high thermal efficiencies are the only options available to meet the energy crisis and we have to avoid wastage and high capital costs if we want to survive in this "energy-starved" competitive world!
We cannot afford to pay the international high prices of fuel and continue to adapt inefficient processes in expensive equipment. Are we going to realise this and take corrective action or face the economic collapse witnessed in many countries in South America?

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.