AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

Sindh High Court has issued notice to Pakistan Petroleum Limited (PPL) for June 8, 2006, in a declaratory and damages suit of a petroleum gas company against termination of contract by PPL.
Wak Ltd, a bottling liquefied petroleum gas company, under the name of 'Wakgas', submitted in its petition that it had entered into an agreement with PPL in 1990, which expired in 2000 but was subsequently renewed on same terms and conditions.
The plaintiff 's counsel, Nafees Siddiqui, said that the defendant on March 9, 2006 without discussing with the plaintiff sent a draft agreement for renewal of the contract for three years on profit sharing basis, and subsequently the plaintiff agreed to accept the terms and conditions of the profit sharing basis.
However, on May 11, 2006, the counsel submitted, a letter was sent by PPL to the plaintiff stating that plaintiff's agreement could not be renewed whereas the signed agreement was already delivered by PPL on May 12, 2006.
He said that an advertisement was given in national dailies by PPL inviting offers from licensed LPG companies for the quota within ten days of publication, but surprisingly on May 13 the supplies of plaintiff were disconnected and the same was being supplied to other companies without even waiting for 10 days after advertisement.
The counsel said that the defendant with ulterior motive and mala fide intention did not renew that agreement and the same was given to other company without merit and transparency.
He further submitted that PPL despite being subject to compulsory and overriding provisions on public procurement contained in the Public Procurement Rules and PPRA Ordinance did not follow prescribed criteria for open and competitive tendering in seeking to award plaintiff's portion of gas to another bidder without following due process and rules.
He requested that contract be renewed for three years as per agreement and for issuing decree against defendant in sum of Rs20,000,000 for the time its supplies remained disconnected. The SHC single bench comprising Justice Zia Pervaiz, after preliminary hearing of the suit issued notice to PPL for June 8.

Copyright Pakistan Press International, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.