AGL 40.08 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
AIRLINK 130.00 Increased By ▲ 3.00 (2.36%)
BOP 6.80 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.64%)
CNERGY 4.70 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.21%)
DCL 8.67 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
DFML 41.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
DGKC 85.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.15%)
FCCL 33.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
FFBL 66.50 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.61%)
FFL 11.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.26%)
HUBC 110.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-0.53%)
HUMNL 14.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.28%)
KEL 5.19 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.39%)
KOSM 8.10 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.74%)
MLCF 40.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
NBP 61.00 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.81%)
OGDC 194.50 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.21%)
PAEL 26.85 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.49%)
PIBTL 7.52 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.04%)
PPL 156.00 Increased By ▲ 2.21 (1.44%)
PRL 27.68 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (5.61%)
PTC 18.38 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (6.98%)
SEARL 85.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.2%)
TELE 7.94 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (4.89%)
TOMCL 34.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
TPLP 9.25 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (4.88%)
TREET 16.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.71%)
TRG 63.00 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.72%)
UNITY 27.79 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.83%)
WTL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
BR100 10,182 Increased By 70.3 (0.69%)
BR30 31,388 Increased By 200.7 (0.64%)
KSE100 95,857 Increased By 861 (0.91%)
KSE30 29,683 Increased By 201.6 (0.68%)

The users of calling cards for long distances and for international calls are facing hardships in getting calls connected as PTCL has partially switched off the DIUs of all LDI operators.
PTCL has blocked interface connection of long distance and international (LDI) telecom operators with its infrastructure for non-payment of dues, bringing the operations of around a dozen companies to a halt.
As half of the switches of the operators are out of order, people who used to call their relatives and the loved ones abroad are experiencing in getting their calls connected. "Now it has become very difficult for the last few days, as I do not get connection even after trying for hours," said a frequent international caller.
An office-bearer of an LDI operator said that PTCL had suspended the service of all operators, but the DIU switches of two companies were immediately put on. However, the service of the remaining remained suspended.
He said that there was some technical problem on the part of PTCL, due to which the prepaid calling card users were facing some problems, but expressed hope that the issue would be resolved soon.
However, PTCL Media Co-ordinator Ather Javed Sufi said that there was no problem on the part of PTCL and if there was any technical shortfall, it could be on the operators' side.
Ali Qadir Gilani, Executive Vice President of PTCL, said that Rs 2.14 were outstanding against LDI operators, out of which around 40 percent had been received and the rest was still outstanding. He said that LDI operators were committed to pay the remaining sum within a week, and if payments were not made, all their switches would be put on halt.
A few competitors termed PTCL step a negative tactic, contradicting market-based mechanism, which creates the company's monopoly after blocking all options of making or receiving international calls other than those through PTCL.
They said that PTCL should differentiate between defaulters and fair clients, as the steps like recent one could damage other operators' business and ultimately cause losses to them, said an office bearer of a competitor firm.
The LDI operators are also discontented with the recent cut in tariff on local and international calls by Pakistan Telecommunication Company and approached the telecom watchdog to reverse the decision, which they warned could affect their more than $100 million investment plans.
Sources said that as per clause 8.2 of LDI licence, an SMP (significant market player) could not change its tariff without prior approval of the authority, as the PTA had to ensure a fair, healthy and competitive LDI market.
Sources suspected that PTCL had deliberately initiated uncompetitive practices against all LDI service providers and recent price reduction was a continuation of this 'ruthless drive' against other operators.
One analyst said that PTCL was trying to create its monopoly, and operators were pressed as the PTCL had witnessed significant decline in its revenues and had lost part of LDI market.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.