AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

The provincial ombudsman has permanently debarred the superintendent and deputy superintendent exams of the Board of Technical Education from all assignments due to their negligent and inefficient conduct and also asked them to tender written apology to a candidate for causing her mental torture due to registration of a false unfair means case against her.
According to the details, complainant Madiha Tanveer, who took the Diploma in Commerce examination in 2005, brought to the notice of the Ombudsman Secretariat, a number of instances of unlawful action taken by the officials of the Board. Enumerating these instances, the complainant pointed out that as soon as she reached home, after appearing in English paper on November 17, 2005, officials of the examination centre concerned came to her house and alleged that after attempting the paper, she had not handed it over to the examination staff.
She strongly rebutted the allegation and stated that she, along with four other candidates, had given back the paper to the invigilators on duty. She was, however, taken to the college where examination centre was established, blamed again for not handing over the paper, and when she remained firm, a threat of registration of an FIR against her was given. The complainant brought this matter to the notice of the Chairman of the Technical Board, but of no avail. Her result was declared as "R.L. Unfair Means Case".
Taking serious notice of the maladministration, Ombudsman directed the Technical Board to extend a written apology to the complainant for causing mental torture to her and issue her a fresh letter specifically informing her that she has been honourably absolved from all unfair means charges. The Ombudsman also directed the Board to consider debarring the Centre superintendent and deputy superintendent from performing any Board's examination duties in future. The Mohtasihb directed the Technical Board to issue a standard operating procedure (SOP), too, containing instructions for proper and smooth conduct of examinations in the future.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed.