AGL 39.30 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.97%)
AIRLINK 129.60 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.08%)
BOP 5.72 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.96%)
CNERGY 4.10 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (6.22%)
DCL 8.81 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.92%)
DFML 41.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-1.25%)
DGKC 89.18 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1%)
FCCL 35.31 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.89%)
FFBL 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.82%)
FFL 10.84 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.17%)
HUBC 108.95 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.17%)
HUMNL 14.94 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.91%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.42%)
KOSM 7.06 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.58%)
MLCF 43.10 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (3.48%)
NBP 60.35 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (1.26%)
OGDC 179.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.50 (-1.91%)
PAEL 26.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.46%)
PIBTL 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.51%)
PPL 147.00 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.2%)
PRL 23.87 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.1%)
PTC 16.75 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.15%)
SEARL 71.25 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (4.32%)
TELE 7.34 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.52%)
TOMCL 36.27 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.89%)
TPLP 8.14 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.69%)
TREET 14.97 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (5.42%)
TRG 50.65 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.4%)
UNITY 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.87%)
WTL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.31%)
BR100 9,859 Increased By 53.8 (0.55%)
BR30 29,765 Increased By 86.7 (0.29%)
KSE100 92,919 Increased By 615.1 (0.67%)
KSE30 28,965 Increased By 124.3 (0.43%)

SECP's token response in the print media does not provide clear picture about the sale of CSIBL. The latest position presented by SECP regarding CSIBL provides ambiguous status of sale, as neither the party's name is disclosed nor any timeline has been given by SECP for the sale of CSIBL, so, as the saying goes, keeping everything vague, makes life easy.
SECP can take any position it feels like in future. Many financial institutions' buys and sales transactions have taken place in the same timeframe, which coincides with SECP take-over of CSIBL. SECP being a powerful regulator, does not seem to be moving fast enough, though it is lot easier for SECP to do so.
If SECP wishes to persuade a foreign/local buyer to buy CSIBL by offering incentives which private wheelers/dealers cannot even imagine, then why it still is not selling CSIBL? This raises questions, as to why, SECP is not serious about selling CSIBL. Does SECP understand the difficulties and sufferings of depositors and creditors of CSIBL? What sort of credibility of country's financial regulators is being exhibited to the outside world? Please, SECP, do us a favour, and sell CSIBL.
One lesson being learnt from the above is, as the issuance of deposit taking licence to CSIBL and NBFCs falls in the realm of SECP, and obviously CSIBL solicited funds on the basis of SECP issued deposit taking licence, now belated monitoring of SECP in case of CSIBL has inflicted heavy blow to the financial positions of all depositors and creditors. This does not present a positive image of SECP's procedure for issuing deposit taking licences to NBFCs, including CSIBL. As a subsequent to the take-over of CSIBL by SECP, the acts of handling CSIBL affairs and sale are awfully sluggish and deplorable. However, at this juncture, all depositors and creditors of CSIBL urge and request the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan to kindly sell CSIBL immediately.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.