AGL 40.13 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.33%)
AIRLINK 131.00 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (1.13%)
BOP 6.86 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.69%)
CNERGY 4.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.59%)
DCL 8.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.12%)
DFML 41.70 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)
DGKC 83.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.14%)
FCCL 32.84 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.21%)
FFBL 76.60 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (1.5%)
FFL 11.83 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.14%)
HUBC 110.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.36%)
HUMNL 14.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.06%)
KEL 5.43 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.74%)
KOSM 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.98%)
MLCF 38.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-2.16%)
NBP 63.89 Increased By ▲ 3.60 (5.97%)
OGDC 197.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.66 (-1.33%)
PAEL 25.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-3%)
PIBTL 7.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.39%)
PPL 156.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-1.22%)
PRL 26.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-2.54%)
PTC 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-3.85%)
SEARL 81.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-1.2%)
TELE 8.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.01%)
TOMCL 34.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.48%)
TPLP 8.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.98%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-3.61%)
TRG 57.88 Decreased By ▼ -3.44 (-5.61%)
UNITY 27.70 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.98%)
WTL 1.46 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.8%)
BR100 10,604 Increased By 196.9 (1.89%)
BR30 31,670 Decreased By -43 (-0.14%)
KSE100 98,782 Increased By 1453.4 (1.49%)
KSE30 30,770 Increased By 577.3 (1.91%)

Withdrawing a major facilitative provision of the Customs Act, 1969, the importers would be unable to obtain written reply from customs department for not accepting the 'declared value' of imported consignments for valuation purposes during 2007-08.
Sources told Business Recorder on Friday that it is practically impossible for the customs officials to convey the grounds for non-acceptance of the declared value in writing involving a large number of cases. Customs has to process all such cases on daily basis for submitting written replies to the importers for not accepting the declared values.
The board has abolished this condition through Finance Act, 2007, which has become applicable from July 1. For this purpose, the words appearing in sub-section (4) of section 25 of the Customs Act, the words "in writing" have been substituted due to non-practicability of application of this provision. Its binding nature has been dilute to overcome objections of the courts whereby recorded evidence is demanded by the courts in such disputes.
Sub-section 10 of Section 25 provides for sequence to be followed for determining the customs value. The words "under this Act" have been omitted and mandatory provision of the section for applying sequential order has been re-worded to provide for "may" to give it non-binding effect.
Through Finance Act 2007, the FBR has made procedural changes in the determination of customs value under section 25A of the Customs Act. Under the Finance Act, collector of customs on his own motion or Director of Customs Valuation on a reference made to him by any person, may determine the customs value of any good or category of goods imported or exported after following method of section 25 of Customs Act. The customs value determined would be applicable customs value for assessment of the relevant imported or exported goods.
Sources said that prior to budget 2007-08 the board failed to effectively check under-invoicing due to absence of the powers of customs to fix values for different classes of goods. The values determined by the customs on the basis of information or date were also challenged before the courts, ensuing protracted litigation.
The powers to determine and notify value of different categories of goods has been given to customs in budget to counter the menace of under-invoicing. Through this change, customs would be able to notify values after regular intervals, especially for those items, which are prone to gross under-invoicing.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2007

Comments

Comments are closed.