AIRLINK 201.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-1.3%)
BOP 9.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.09%)
CNERGY 6.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
FCCL 35.37 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.55%)
FFL 17.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.35%)
FLYNG 24.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.35%)
HUBC 138.10 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.51%)
HUMNL 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.66%)
KEL 4.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.81%)
KOSM 6.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
MLCF 46.39 Increased By ▲ 2.08 (4.69%)
OGDC 222.69 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (0.35%)
PACE 7.09 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 43.27 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.7%)
PIAHCLA 17.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.35%)
PIBTL 8.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
POWER 9.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.67%)
PPL 188.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.61 (-0.84%)
PRL 43.34 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.7%)
PTC 25.45 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.64%)
SEARL 110.70 Increased By ▲ 4.29 (4.03%)
SILK 1.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.96%)
SSGC 42.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.72%)
SYM 18.45 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.76%)
TELE 9.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.44%)
TPLP 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (4.2%)
TRG 68.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.18%)
WAVESAPP 10.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.59%)
WTL 1.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.53%)
YOUW 4.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.73%)
BR100 12,220 Increased By 82.9 (0.68%)
BR30 37,317 Increased By 171.8 (0.46%)
KSE100 115,845 Increased By 572.7 (0.5%)
KSE30 36,476 Increased By 164.8 (0.45%)

The Lahore High Court (LHC) set aside a decision by a civil judge, saying arbitration could not be demanded after acceptance of a final settlement.
The court passed these orders in a petition filed by Managing Director Pak American Fertilisers Company Ltd (PAFCL) challenging the decision, allowing arbitration after final settlement with respondent M/s Industrial Fabrication Company on work awarded for equipment erection and above ground piping at PAFCL premises at Iskenderabad.
The petitioner contended that respondent company had submitted its final bill, which was found to be exaggerated and finally it was settled by the parties. The respondent after one and half year without referring to its letter alleged that undue deduction had been made and simultaneously demanded arbitration under clause 37.3.2 of the contract.
It was argued that not only such a demand violated clauses 37.1 and 37.1.1 of the general conditions of the contract but also abused existence of any dispute between the parties since the same had already been finally settled and a cheque in respect of equipment erection issued.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.