AIRLINK 206.74 Decreased By ▼ -6.08 (-2.86%)
BOP 10.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.95%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-4.57%)
FCCL 33.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.4%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-5.9%)
FLYNG 22.42 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.75%)
HUBC 127.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.91 (-1.48%)
HUMNL 14.01 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.08%)
KEL 4.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.23%)
KOSM 6.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-7.65%)
MLCF 42.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-2.82%)
OGDC 213.00 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.02%)
PACE 6.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.32%)
PAEL 41.25 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.19%)
PIAHCLA 16.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
PIBTL 8.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-3.82%)
POWER 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
PPL 184.00 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (0.53%)
PRL 38.41 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-3.08%)
PTC 24.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-2.26%)
SEARL 96.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.51 (-1.54%)
SILK 1.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.61 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-2.68%)
SYM 18.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-4.03%)
TELE 8.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.78%)
TPLP 12.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.69%)
TRG 64.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.49%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.37%)
WTL 1.80 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.56%)
YOUW 4.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.5%)
BR100 11,751 Decreased By -115 (-0.97%)
BR30 35,467 Decreased By -230.1 (-0.64%)
KSE100 112,796 Decreased By -1352.7 (-1.19%)
KSE30 35,510 Decreased By -442 (-1.23%)

The Lahore High Court has issued notices in a petition filed by Chaudhry Khush Akhtar Sobhani challenging a decision by the Sialkot PP-121 returning officer allowing Rana Arif Iqbal to contest the elections. Sobhani argued that Iqbal was a civil servant working as a gauged reader.
He said he had obtained a medical leave in 2000 and was suspended since he failed to turn up. His final decision was not passed till filling of his nomination papers in constituency PP-121. He said respondent RO illegally relied upon the affidavit of the respondent contended that he had resigned from his service in 2000.
He said not only was the said affidavit was confronted to appellant reliance thereof was not even otherwise valid as no date dairy number or even photocopy of the so called resignation was forthcoming.
He said even if the concocted story is accepted the respondent could not avoid disqualification unless he could show that his resignation was accepted and actually acted upon. The respondent being inherently disqualified the permission accorded to him by respondent RO so as to contest is nothing but abuse of process of law and therefore not sustainable.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2008

Comments

Comments are closed.