AIRLINK 189.64 Decreased By ▼ -7.01 (-3.56%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
CNERGY 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
FCCL 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (3.39%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.64%)
FLYNG 23.83 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (6.15%)
HUBC 126.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.97%)
HUMNL 13.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.79%)
KEL 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.21%)
KOSM 6.58 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.3%)
MLCF 43.28 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.51%)
OGDC 224.96 Increased By ▲ 11.93 (5.6%)
PACE 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (5.28%)
PAEL 41.74 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.13%)
PIAHCLA 17.19 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.2%)
PIBTL 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.45%)
POWER 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.61%)
PPL 193.09 Increased By ▲ 9.52 (5.19%)
PRL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.43%)
PTC 24.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
SEARL 94.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.6%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.94%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-2.42%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.8%)
TPLP 12.39 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.47%)
TRG 62.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.66%)
WAVESAPP 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.53%)
WTL 1.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.75%)
BR100 11,814 Increased By 90.4 (0.77%)
BR30 36,234 Increased By 874.6 (2.47%)
KSE100 113,247 Increased By 609 (0.54%)
KSE30 35,712 Increased By 253.6 (0.72%)

Multan consumers, whose electricity metres are burnt in rain or turned defective, are being fleeced by power authorities on the basis of flawed billing formula that favours the company at the cost of consumers' wallet. Multan Electric Power Company (Mepco) is short of electricity metres and has not been able to replace defective meters in a number of cases.
The fault lies with the supplier and not the ill-fated consumer, who are paying the price of using the essential daily utility. Pepco rules state that a consumer with a defective electric metre would be charged for electricity consumed in the corresponding period of the same month a year ago or the average consumption of the past 11 months, whichever is higher. This rule benefits Pepco of an advantage in the sense that if consumption in a particular month is higher, then the consumer will be charged the higher amount.
During summer, a consumer would be charged for the same number of units consumed a year ago. However during winter, the consumption would be below the yearly average and in this case the average of 11month consumption would be applicable. This rule, though in favour of supplier, was tolerable when the power supply by the distribution companies lasted round the clock. However, it enables Pepco to pocket a lot of money when the duration of power outages ranges between 8-12 hours.
Therefore, the consumer has to pay more money even though it is not their responsibility if new metres were not available. The billing disregards or fails to consider any power saving measures consumers could have adopted. A reasonable solution in this regard is that until metres are replaced, the number of hours of load shedding should be deducted from bills sent to such consumers.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.