New York Times threatens to shut Boston Globe

The New York Times Co has threatened to shut The Boston Globe unless the newspaper's unions quickly agree to $20 million in concessions, the Globe reported on Friday, quoting union leaders. The union officials said executives from the Globe and the Times, which owns the Boston newspaper, made the demands on Thursday morning in a meeting with leaders of the newspaper's 13 unions, the Globe reported.
If the Globe closed, it would join a growing list of big city dailies that have shut down this year, including EW Scripps Co's Rocky Mountain News and the print edition of Hearst Corp's Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Hearst's San Francisco Chronicle might join that list.
Possible concessions at the Globe, the 14th-largest US daily paper by weekday circulation, include pay cuts, the end of pension contributions by the company and the elimination of lifetime job guarantees for some veteran staff, the paper said, quoting Boston Newspaper Guild president Daniel Totten. The guild is the Globe's biggest union, representing more than 700 editorial, advertising and business office employees, the report said.
"Management told union leaders Thursday that the Globe will lose $85 million in 2009, unless serious cutbacks are made, according to a Globe employee briefed on the discussions," the Globe report said. That compares with an estimated $50 million loss last year, the newspaper quoted the employee as saying.
"The ad revenues have fallen off the cliff," the Globe quoted Ralph Giallanella, secretary-treasurer of the Teamsters Local 259, as saying. "Just based on everything that's going on around the country, they're serious." His union represents about 200 drivers who deliver the paper. Giallanella and Globe executives could not be reached by Reuters.
A Times spokeswoman declined to comment. Totten was not immediately available for comment. The Times sought the concessions because it can no longer subsidise the Globe's losses, the report said, quoting the Globe employee, who requested anonymity because the person was not authorised to speak publicly.
The threat comes as a host of US newspaper publishers have reduced staff, declared bankruptcy or shuttered newspapers to cope with a recession that has squeezed advertising revenues and with a new era in which readers seek news online. Many US newspapers have lost 20 percent or more of their advertising revenue as more people get news online for free.