AIRLINK 201.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-1.3%)
BOP 9.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.09%)
CNERGY 6.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
FCCL 35.37 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.55%)
FFL 17.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.35%)
FLYNG 24.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.35%)
HUBC 138.10 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.51%)
HUMNL 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.66%)
KEL 4.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.81%)
KOSM 6.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
MLCF 46.39 Increased By ▲ 2.08 (4.69%)
OGDC 222.69 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (0.35%)
PACE 7.09 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 43.27 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.7%)
PIAHCLA 17.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.35%)
PIBTL 8.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
POWER 9.08 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.67%)
PPL 188.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.61 (-0.84%)
PRL 43.34 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.7%)
PTC 25.45 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.64%)
SEARL 110.70 Increased By ▲ 4.29 (4.03%)
SILK 1.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.96%)
SSGC 42.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.72%)
SYM 18.45 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.76%)
TELE 9.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.44%)
TPLP 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (4.2%)
TRG 68.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.18%)
WAVESAPP 10.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.59%)
WTL 1.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.53%)
YOUW 4.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.73%)
BR100 12,220 Increased By 82.9 (0.68%)
BR30 37,317 Increased By 171.8 (0.46%)
KSE100 115,845 Increased By 572.7 (0.5%)
KSE30 36,476 Increased By 164.8 (0.45%)

A division bench of the Lahore High Court (LHC) has issued pre-admission notice for April 27 in a writ petition, challenging advancing of the clock by an hour (Daylight Time Saving- DTS) as well as unequal burden of load-shedding on the citizens.
Petitioner Imtiaz Rashid Qureshi, through his counsel Barrister Farooq Hassan, contended that alteration made in the time from April 15 last was without any statutory or constitutional authority, unreasonable, arbitrary, lacking in cohesion and against the fundamental rights of the people.
He said such exercise of power was void per se, as the Federation was utterly confused as to differentiate between advancing of the clocks and backing them up. The petitioner said the government claimed that advancing the clock by one hour aimed at doing equal good to the people was discriminatory and arbitrary in constitutional terms as well as undemocratic.
As to load shedding, the petitioner said, the authorities claimed that the difference of 2200mw in supply and demand of electricity existed per day load shedding across the board should not exceed three hours, which, however, was from 16 to 18 hours a day. He prayed to the court to strike down the notification relating to advancing the clock by one hour and also direct the authorities to put equal burden of load shedding on the citizens.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed.