AGL 40.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.5%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-0.5%)
BOP 6.69 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
CNERGY 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.35%)
DCL 8.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.03%)
DFML 41.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.29%)
DGKC 85.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.58%)
FCCL 33.11 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (1.69%)
FFBL 66.10 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (2.67%)
FFL 11.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.52%)
HUBC 111.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-1.2%)
HUMNL 14.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
KEL 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.58%)
KOSM 7.66 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (4.08%)
MLCF 40.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.3%)
NBP 60.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.93%)
OGDC 194.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.04%)
PAEL 26.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.71%)
PIBTL 7.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.24%)
PPL 153.79 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (0.73%)
PRL 26.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
PTC 17.18 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (6.44%)
SEARL 85.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.12%)
TELE 7.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.3%)
TOMCL 34.39 Decreased By ▼ -2.08 (-5.7%)
TPLP 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TREET 16.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
TRG 62.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.3%)
UNITY 27.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-3.23%)
WTL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.99%)
BR100 10,112 Increased By 26 (0.26%)
BR30 31,188 Increased By 17.5 (0.06%)
KSE100 94,996 Increased By 232 (0.24%)
KSE30 29,481 Increased By 71 (0.24%)

A two-member bench of Supreme Court here Friday admitted a petition of Sharif family for regular hearing, challenging notices of tax department of tax evasion. The petition was filed by Mian Nawaz Sharif, his wife Kalsoom Nawaz, Mian Shahbaz Sharif, his wife Nusrat Shahbaz, Hamza Shahbaz, Mian Tariq Shafi and Mian Javaid Shafi.
The income tax department had accused Nawaz Sharif of evading tax on purchase of a helicopter, which he used for his election campaign in mid-1990s. Kalsoom Nawaz was asked to pay Rs 2.9 million as additional wealth tax and Rs 1.9 million as additional income tax for her income during the years 1990 to 2000. While Shahbaz Sharif was directed to pay Rs 2.3 million as additional wealth tax and Rs 1.6 million as additional income tax for the same years.
Advocate Malik Tariq Aziz, counsel for Sharif family submitted that the tax department never disclosed as to what amount of tax was due and it was a vague notice, which did not have legal sanctity. He said the order of income tax commissioner was repugnant and inconsistent with section 3 and 4 of Wealth Tax Act 1963.
Aziz said Kalsoom Nawaz and Shahbaz had paid the income tax during the stipulated time and no objection was raised against it at that time. He said the notices were issued to petitioners after a year and the objection about the tax assessment was raised about 1213 days instead of the normal 60 days of the required period. The counsel pleaded that the re-opening of the case was illegal as the tax department already accepted tax and now could not raise any objection in this regard.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.