AGL 40.21 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.45%)
AIRLINK 127.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.05%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.91%)
CNERGY 4.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.26%)
DCL 8.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
DFML 41.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.01%)
DGKC 86.11 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.37%)
FCCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.22%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 112.46 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (1.53%)
HUMNL 14.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.73%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
MLCF 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.47%)
NBP 61.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 194.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.35%)
PAEL 26.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.18%)
PIBTL 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-6.79%)
PPL 152.68 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.1%)
PRL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PTC 16.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.74%)
SEARL 85.70 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (1.85%)
TELE 7.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.64%)
TOMCL 36.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.5%)
TREET 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-4.64%)
TRG 62.74 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (7.03%)
UNITY 28.20 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (4.99%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.9%)
BR100 10,086 Increased By 85.5 (0.85%)
BR30 31,170 Increased By 168.1 (0.54%)
KSE100 94,764 Increased By 571.8 (0.61%)
KSE30 29,410 Increased By 209 (0.72%)

ISLAMABAD: Jamaat-e-Islami leader and former member of the National Assembly, Mian Muhammad Aslam has moved an intra-court appeal before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) against a single bench's verdict, wherein, it had rejected a petition filed against the recent increase in the petroleum products' prices in the country.

A division bench of the IHC comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Maingul Hassan heard the ICA filed by Mian Aslam through his counsel, Rao Abdul Rahim Advocate.

In the ICA, he has cited the Federation of Pakistan through the president, the prime minister of Pakistan, the secretary Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Petroleum, and the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority as respondents. The petitioner's counsel requested the court to set aside singe bench's verdict and direct the respondents to decrease the petroleum products' prices.

He also requested the court to declare the imposition of multiple taxes at higher rates as unconstitutional and the respondent may be directed to reduce taxes over a commodity of basic need for the economy as well as the general public.

The lawyer prayed before the court that the respondents may be directed to revise the base prices of the petroleum products and reduce it as per the previous rates. Then, he requested the court to grant more time for preparation of the case. The bench accepted his plea and deferred the hearing for the next week.

In the ICA, the petitioner stated that during the instant crisis due to current pandemic COVID-19, the economy of our country as well as the worldwide markets have faced huge decline. Due to which the middle and lower income people are facing huge financial stress because of major cuts in their earnings.

He added that on 26th June, despite slight fluctuation in the crude oil prices in international market, the government has endorsed huge increase in prices of petroleum products in an illegal and hasty manner by increasing base price of the petroleum products and petroleum levy over it in total disregard to the lower international market prices of the petroleum prices as compared to the last calendar year prices for benefiting the large petroleum companies in an unjustified manner at the cost of adding miseries to already suffering public.

Earlier, a single bench of the IHC comprising Justice Athar Minallah had conducted hearing of the petition filed by Mian Aslam and dismissed the same after hearing the arguments in the matter.

Justice Athar had observed in the judgment that in the instant case nothing had been placed on record to indicate that a case was made out for interference by the court in a matter, which exclusively fell within the domain of the executive.

He had noted, "In the circumstances the prayers sought are not justiciable. Moreover, the matter is of a nature that this Court ought to exercise utmost restraint because intervention would prejudice the policies and actions of the executive in dealing with the challenges that relate to the economy."

He had added, "For the above reasons, the prayers sought are not justiciable and thus the petition is accordingly dismissed."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.