AIRLINK 193.00 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (0.6%)
BOP 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 7.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
FCCL 37.99 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.34%)
FFL 15.83 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 25.62 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.22%)
HUBC 130.60 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.33%)
HUMNL 13.85 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.91%)
KEL 4.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 6.25 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.64%)
MLCF 44.60 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.7%)
OGDC 209.10 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.08%)
PACE 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.07%)
PAEL 40.98 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.06%)
PIAHCLA 17.78 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.08%)
PIBTL 8.09 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.25%)
POWER 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.54%)
PPL 181.01 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (1.37%)
PRL 39.40 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.82%)
PTC 24.28 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.58%)
SEARL 108.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.93%)
SILK 0.99 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (2.06%)
SSGC 38.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.84%)
SYM 19.29 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.89%)
TELE 8.68 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.93%)
TPLP 12.40 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.24%)
TRG 65.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.03%)
WAVESAPP 12.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.33%)
WTL 1.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 4.02 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.77%)
BR100 11,974 Increased By 43.7 (0.37%)
BR30 35,797 Increased By 137.8 (0.39%)
KSE100 113,731 Increased By 525 (0.46%)
KSE30 35,773 Increased By 207.4 (0.58%)

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has granted stay to Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan Limited against payment of Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) on the grounds that the said amount despite provision in financial statements was not charged and recovered from the customers.

According to a written order on a suit filed by Reckitt Benckiser Pakistan released on Saturday, the SHC restrained the defendants, the Ministry of Energy, the Sui Southern Gas Company and others, from taking any coercive action against the plaintiff over non-payment of installments of the GIDC arrears showing in the bill.

According to the orders, the counsel for the plaintiff submitted that his client was engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of household products and that it fell under the category of the gas consumers who had neither collected the GIDC from their clients/customers nor passed on to their clients and customers addition in the cost of goods.

The counsel stated that in the period between 2011 and 2020 the plaintiff had not paid the GIDC to the defendant, the SSGC, on the basis of injunctive orders and reported judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the Federation of Pakistan V. Durrani Ceramics and others (2014 SCMR 1630) case.

The counsel stated that the plaintiffs never collected the GIDC from their clients/customers and did not even pass it on to their clients, which is evident from the income tax returns, books of accounts and customers auditor's report.

In case, a record of the company's showing non-receiving of the GIDC from its customers/clients is not filed with the memo of the plaint, shall be filed along with statement within seven days.

The counsel stated that in similar and other circumstances, other suits including suit no 1185/2020 have been filed wherein via order dated 16-09-2020, the defendants were restrained from taking any coercive action against the plaintiffs for non-payment of bill issued to them showing arrears including disconnection of gas and prayed the court to be treated the same.

The court ordered issuance of notices to the defendants and restrained them from taking any coercive action against the plaintiffs for non-payment of installments of GIDC arrears showing in the bill till the next date of hearing. The court directed the plaintiff to pay the current bill within the due date.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.