AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
AIRLINK 177.92 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (0.52%)
BOP 12.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.55%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.2%)
FCCL 45.99 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (9.45%)
FFL 15.16 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.16%)
FLYNG 27.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.3%)
HUBC 132.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.84%)
HUMNL 13.29 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.55%)
KEL 4.46 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
KOSM 6.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 56.63 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (3.89%)
OGDC 223.84 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.57%)
PACE 5.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
PAEL 41.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.51%)
PIAHCLA 16.01 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.5%)
PIBTL 9.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.79%)
POWER 11.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PPL 186.63 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.43%)
PRL 34.90 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.72%)
PTC 23.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
SEARL 94.96 Increased By ▲ 3.89 (4.27%)
SILK 1.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.7%)
SSGC 35.50 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (4.47%)
SYM 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.01%)
TELE 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
TPLP 10.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.73%)
TRG 59.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.82%)
WAVESAPP 10.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
YOUW 3.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.26%)
BR100 12,130 Increased By 107.3 (0.89%)
BR30 37,246 Increased By 640.2 (1.75%)
KSE100 114,399 Increased By 685.5 (0.6%)
KSE30 35,458 Increased By 156.2 (0.44%)

EDITORIAL: If the 2018 general election was fair, free and transparent, the final word on it is yet to be said. The political opposition has persistently claimed that the entire electoral exercise was manipulated to ensure that neither leaderships of the two previous governments returns to power. And in support of their claim they point out quite a few inadequacies, particularly the inordinate and unexplainable delay on the part of NADRA (National Database and Registration Authority) to release the vote-count, which helped Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) to win election and form its government. On whose behalf the transparency of the general election became hazy they do not name anybody, but they do call the PTI-led government a ‘selected’ commodity. According to a newspaper report, one such incident of ‘outside’ pressure to keep the present opposition out of power took place on the eve of 2018 general election when the then Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Saqib Nisar, reportedly asked a judge of Islamabad High Court to ensure that an incarcerated Maryam Nawaz was not set free. The newspaper based its story on a notarized affidavit of an ex-Chief Justice of Gilgit-Baltistan, Rana Shamim. In quite some detail, former Justice Rana Shamim has narrated how the then Chief Justice of Pakistan got in touch with an IHC (Islamabad High Court) judge to convey his mind. Former Justice Saqib Nisar has stoutly rejected the claim of former Chief Justice of Gilgit-Baltistan. Since there is the claim that higher judiciary was involved in pre-election political engineering, the Chief Justice of IHC took notice of the ‘news’ pertaining to the affidavit and summoned the newspaper’s publisher, editor and reporter, as well as the author of the affidavit, Justice Rana Shamim. After a brief hearing, the court issued notices to them and asked them to appear before it next week. It is quite clear that it is for the court to decide whether or not the said newspaper did commit the crime of contempt of court. We, therefore, have no comment on that. But what should be talked about is the political fallout the saga of the alleged call is going to be on the national political atmospherics as these tend to obtain now when the PTI government is under the opposition’s attack on many fronts. The government has described the episode as ‘a viciously cooked-up story’ to malign the higher judiciary as the opposition leadership finds itself in a hot soup of corruption cases. According to the Prime Minister, for example, “the opposition is digging its own grave”. But the opposition feels elated with Opposition Leader in National Assembly Shehbaz Sharif tweeting that former Justice Rana Shamim’s affidavit is “another vindication of Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz in the court of public opinion”. According to Maryam, “the explosive news story peels off a thick layer of a grand scheme employed to target Nawaz Sharif & Maryam Nawaz. Allah has His own way of revealing the truth”. Not only have PML (N) leaders underscored the need for debating this issue in parliament, they have also urged the Chief Justice of Pakistan to set up a commission to investigate it. No doubt, there is a question about timing of the affidavit as it surreptitiously emerged on the scene almost on the eve of the hearing of Maryam Nawaz’s plea seeking annulment of her conviction in the Avenfield apartments reference at IHC. Politics in Pakistan is more complex than it used to be.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.