AGL 37.94 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.24%)
AIRLINK 155.22 Increased By ▲ 12.75 (8.95%)
BOP 9.07 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.67%)
CNERGY 6.72 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (17.48%)
DCL 9.53 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.14%)
DFML 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.21%)
DGKC 92.95 Increased By ▲ 3.64 (4.08%)
FCCL 38.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.42%)
FFBL 78.58 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (1.47%)
FFL 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.15%)
HUBC 110.19 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (0.82%)
HUMNL 14.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.59%)
KEL 5.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.87%)
KOSM 8.47 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.29%)
MLCF 45.66 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (2.54%)
NBP 76.17 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (3.46%)
OGDC 191.87 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.06%)
PAEL 30.48 Increased By ▲ 2.77 (10%)
PIBTL 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.13%)
PPL 166.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.36%)
PRL 29.44 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (9.73%)
PTC 20.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-3%)
SEARL 96.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.91 (-0.93%)
TELE 8.27 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.73%)
TOMCL 34.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-2.11%)
TPLP 10.22 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.23%)
TREET 17.66 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.79%)
TRG 61.25 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.41%)
UNITY 31.97 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.04%)
WTL 1.47 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.68%)
BR100 11,216 Increased By 119.9 (1.08%)
BR30 33,650 Increased By 395.8 (1.19%)
KSE100 104,559 Increased By 1284.1 (1.24%)
KSE30 32,366 Increased By 396.5 (1.24%)

ISLAMABAD: President Arif Alvi has rejected three representations filed by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) against the three redressal orders issued by the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) for issuance of refunds.

As per details, in one such case, Saifullah Khan claimed refund amounting to Rs0.053 million. He e-filed refund application; however, despite his repeated efforts the department failed to dispose of refund application within stipulated period. He, accordingly, took up the matter with the FTO by filing a complaint.

The FTO, while deciding the above complaint directed the commissioner IR Peshawar Zone to revisit the order, while exercising powers conferred under section 122A and to pass fresh order for tax year 2020 under section 170 (A) of the Income Tax Ordinance. The said orders of the FTO were later on challenged by the FBR before the President; however, the President has upheld the decision of the FTO and disposed the representation.

In another income tax case, the complainant engaged in manufacturing of vegetable ghee filed return of income for tax year 2020 under section 114 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance,2001 and claimed refund amounting to Rs63.40 million.

The refund arouses on account of excess tax deduction at source under sections 153 (1) (a), 231A, 235 and 236(1) (a) of the ordinance, the refund application for tax years 2020 was e-filed; however, despite repeated efforts of the complainant, the department failed to dispose of refund application and the complainant thereafter approached the FTO for redressal of his grievances.

Later on, while deciding the complaint, the FTO ordered the FBR to direct the commissioner –IR enforcement zone -1, LTO Lahore to complete the verification and settle complainant’s refund for tax year 2020. The FBR challenged the findings of the FTO before the President; however, the President has upheld the decision of the FTO and rejected the representation of the FBR.

In another similar case, the FTO’s recommendations regarding processing another Rs81.5 million income tax refund case was also upheld by the Presidency, while rejecting a representation filed by the FBR.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.