AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: A majority of restaurants and eateries in the federal capital are involved in massive sales tax evasion since they collect 17 percent sales tax from their customers but do not deposit the same in the national kitty.

A survey conducted by Business Recorder revealed that only a few restaurants are integrated with the Point of Sale (POS) system of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

However, the tax department has failed to register all potential restaurants with the POS system for collection of the due amount of sales tax recovered from their customers.

Some restaurants have used fraudulent techniques by displaying “credit card machine out of order” signs to avoid documented payment of sales tax. Similarly, dummy receipts are issued by other posh restaurants in Islamabad.

Many customers have reported bogus/fake invoices to the FBR, but there is no automated acknowledgement or action on such complaints. "If the FBR is unable to enforce the POS system at restaurants in Islamabad what would be the situation in other cities of the country?" question affected customers.

A large number of restaurants have adopted different techniques to evade sales tax.

First, the restaurants are reluctant to register with the FBR’s POS system. The restaurants are required to install approved fiscal electronic device and register all branches with the Board’s computerized system, from which they make supplies and shall also register each POS to activate the integration and record the sale on a real-time basis.

However, data communicated through the POS showed that most of the restaurants located in posh areas of Islamabad either transmit very low sale or no sale at all to the FBR.

In these cases, 17 percent sales tax is collected but is not deposited with the FBR.

Second, certain restaurants are using a parallel system of invoicing which causes loss to the national exchequer. If the consumer insists on an FBR invoice, the restaurant either issues a genuine receipt containing the sales tax invoice number or refunds 17 percent on the spot to avoid confrontation or complaints to the FBR.

Third, the restaurant is integrated with the FBR’s POS system, but the genuine invoice is not issued to the customer till he/she insists on being given a genuine invoice having the POS number.

Fourth, the restaurant issues a fake FBR-Invoice number to the customer paying 17 percent sales tax, but the invoice number is not verifiable with the FBR’s POS verification system.

Fifth, actual sales as well as sales tax payable is not shown in the sales tax invoices. The actual sales tax is not being charged from the clients/customers.

Sixth, sales tax collected on sales tax invoices is neither being deposited into the government exchequer nor accounted for in the sales tax records.

Furthermore, they said, several restaurants are not even registered with the sales tax department, which is a mandatory requirement under the sales tax law.

As compared to local hotels/restaurants, international food chains etc are predominantly documented and issue sales tax invoices.

When contacted, sources told Business Recorder that so far, the FBR’s POS system has registered only 4,500 retailers after a large-scale enforcement drive as well as denying input tax adjustment. The said retailers have hardly deposited Rs1-2 billion sales tax.

Under section 40B of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the FBR can depute Inland Revenue Officers at restaurants that are not integrated with the POS system, for monitoring their sales for payment of sales tax.

The deputation of tax officers at the business premises of restaurants requires a large workforce. Due to a limited workforce for enforcement, the FBR prefers to depute tax officers to monitor sales/turnover at business premises of big units or manufacturers.

For instance, the deputation of Inland Revenue officers at restaurants may result in the recovery of Rs1 million to Rs2 million from each restaurant. However, the monitoring of production and sales of large manufacturing units may result in the recovery of revenue to the tune of millions. Therefore, the FBR has preferred to depute tax officers where huge revenue potential is involved.

The Regional Tax Office (RTO), Islamabad is required to launch a crackdown against the restaurants that are involved in distortion of a monitoring and tracking system of taxable activities at the POS by electronic means.

In the past, the RTO’s officers have warned the restaurants to declare actual sales and ensure that no parallel system of invoicing is used, which causes loss to the national exchequer.

The strict monitoring of restaurants is necessary to make sure sales are recorded in the FBR’s system on a real-time basis through the POS and sales tax collected by the restaurants is deposited in the national treasury.

The Chief Commissioners are empowered to initiate criminal proceedings under Sales Tax Act, 1990, in case any restaurant is found involved in manipulation, they added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

MalikSaabSays Jun 28, 2022 02:54pm
Just ammend the law with following provision: 1. Anyone using invoicing system other than official POS integrated system, or not generating invoice of each sale is liable to criminal proceedings and fine. 2. Evidence gathered through sting operations is admissible. 3. Mandatory for FBR to conduct sting operations against restaurants and gather audio visual evidence of illegal invoicing operations. 4. The first citizen who reports and provides actionable evidence of illegal invoicing and tax evasion will be awarded cash reward credited into their tax-registered bank account equal to invoice amount. Make the public your eyes and ears. Then just watch the magic happen.
thumb_up Recommended (0)