AGL 37.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 217.40 Decreased By ▼ -5.49 (-2.46%)
BOP 10.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.11%)
CNERGY 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.04%)
DCL 9.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.4%)
DFML 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.12%)
DGKC 102.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.76 (-4.46%)
FCCL 34.23 Decreased By ▼ -2.84 (-7.66%)
FFL 19.26 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.1%)
HASCOL 12.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.58%)
HUBC 130.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.11 (-1.59%)
HUMNL 14.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.38%)
KEL 5.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.78%)
KOSM 7.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.2%)
MLCF 45.20 Decreased By ▼ -2.98 (-6.19%)
NBP 65.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.98%)
OGDC 220.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.91 (-1.3%)
PAEL 44.32 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.89%)
PIBTL 9.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 191.44 Decreased By ▼ -6.80 (-3.43%)
PRL 41.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-1.63%)
PTC 26.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-2.77%)
SEARL 107.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.48 (-2.25%)
TELE 10.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.09%)
TOMCL 35.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.94%)
TPLP 14.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-2.61%)
TREET 25.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-3.13%)
TRG 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-2.18%)
UNITY 33.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-2.02%)
WTL 1.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-2.79%)
BR100 12,279 Decreased By -84 (-0.68%)
BR30 37,353 Decreased By -865.4 (-2.26%)
KSE100 116,485 Decreased By -634.9 (-0.54%)
KSE30 36,703 Decreased By -233.6 (-0.63%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed that under section 17(A) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, a family court shall issue a decree on a suit for maintenance allowance straightaway if a defendant fails to pay interim maintenance so fixed. The court held that the right of any litigant cannot be allowed to interfere in the dispensation of justice, especially in a manner so as to endorse his repeated defiance of valid orders passed against him.

The high court issued these observations in a petition of one Naveed Akhtar, who failed not once but twice on the same count and tried to avoid and wriggle out of the liability so imposed.

The court said the social, legal and religious responsibilities of the petitioner also bind him to support his own biological daughters, provide for their maintenance, and to do so in a respectable way.

Seen from whichever angle the petition in question merits to be dismissed since the judgments under challenge are unexceptionable. Therefore, the petition is dismissed, the court ordered.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.