AIRLINK 206.81 Increased By ▲ 6.52 (3.26%)
BOP 10.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.62%)
CNERGY 7.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.11%)
FCCL 34.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
FFL 17.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.38%)
FLYNG 25.27 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.69%)
HUBC 129.25 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (1.13%)
HUMNL 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.1%)
KEL 4.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.8%)
KOSM 6.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.56%)
MLCF 44.85 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.52%)
OGDC 221.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.16%)
PACE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.7%)
PAEL 42.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.14%)
PIAHCLA 17.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.27%)
PIBTL 8.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
POWER 9.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.44%)
PPL 191.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-0.79%)
PRL 42.94 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (3.47%)
PTC 25.44 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (4.09%)
SEARL 103.45 Increased By ▲ 2.18 (2.15%)
SILK 1.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.9%)
SSGC 43.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.87%)
SYM 18.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.97%)
TELE 9.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.1%)
TPLP 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.69%)
TRG 70.00 Increased By ▲ 3.81 (5.76%)
WAVESAPP 10.55 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
WTL 1.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.12%)
YOUW 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.99%)
BR100 12,063 Increased By 23.7 (0.2%)
BR30 36,872 Increased By 183.2 (0.5%)
KSE100 114,837 Increased By 32.8 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,045 Decreased By -57.3 (-0.16%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court set aside ex parte decision of an additional district judge Lahore passed against respondent Muhammad Adil and observed limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and it required to be determined on case to case basis.

The court observed that the trial court while dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for setting aside of ex parte decree as the case of the petitioner was that he had not been served with summons rather attained knowledge on his arrest in execution of afore-referred decree, therefore, the impugned order whereby application was dismissed on technical grounds did not appear to be based on proper exercise of jurisdiction by the trial court.

The court observed that a distinction may be drawn in cases where ex parte decree is passed after service of summons and where it is passed due to non-service of summons. The court therefore remanded the matter to the trial court and observed trial court shall decide the same afresh after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties on its own merits in accordance with law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.