AGL 40.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.27%)
AIRLINK 129.74 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.51%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.62 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (3.36%)
DCL 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
DFML 41.91 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (3.2%)
DGKC 83.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.13%)
FCCL 32.70 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.11%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.32%)
HUBC 110.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-1.13%)
HUMNL 14.65 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (2.38%)
KEL 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
KOSM 8.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-6.35%)
MLCF 39.89 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.17%)
NBP 60.45 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 198.45 Increased By ▲ 3.51 (1.8%)
PAEL 26.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
PIBTL 7.71 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.07%)
PPL 158.00 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.43%)
PRL 26.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
PTC 18.40 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.55%)
SEARL 82.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1%)
TELE 8.34 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.34%)
TOMCL 34.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.29%)
TPLP 9.14 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.75%)
TREET 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.71%)
TRG 61.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.84%)
UNITY 27.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.33%)
WTL 1.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (7.03%)
BR100 10,400 Increased By 213 (2.09%)
BR30 31,653 Increased By 316.8 (1.01%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has taken notice of the harsh treatment of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to an old lady (senior citizen) by issuing multiple notices and ex-parte orders against her for the past many years.

An old lady and a compliant taxpayer before Tax Ombudsman was burdened with multiple notices for audit for the Tax Year 2016. She was engaged in textile manufacturing business, final showcause notice for compliance was issued.

However, the complainant applied for an extension which was rejected and an ex-parte order was passed creating demand of Rs2.7 million.

However, all the relevant details of purchases and expenses were not only filed but also duly examined by the officer but the ex-parte order was passed without considering the details available on record.

The complainant being aggrieved, took up the matter with the FTO.

In response, the chief commissioner–IR contended that the case of the complainant was selected under Section 214C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Subsequently, the ACIR issued notice to produce records for the purpose of audit but the taxpayer did not fulfill its statutory duty. However, in order to provide another opportunity to the taxpayer, show cause notice was issued. As the taxpayer failed to make any compliance, the order was passed under Section 121(1) on the basis of failure to provide explanation.

According to the findings of the FTO, the issue was not assessment of income and determination of tax liability.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.