AGL 38.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.66%)
AIRLINK 129.50 Increased By ▲ 4.43 (3.54%)
BOP 7.08 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.36%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.25%)
DCL 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.67%)
DFML 38.37 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (2.76%)
DGKC 79.70 Increased By ▲ 1.93 (2.48%)
FCCL 32.00 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (4.64%)
FFBL 72.60 Increased By ▲ 3.74 (5.43%)
FFL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.12%)
HUBC 109.74 Increased By ▲ 5.24 (5.01%)
HUMNL 13.80 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.3%)
KEL 4.93 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (6.02%)
KOSM 7.46 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (4.04%)
MLCF 37.60 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (3.18%)
NBP 69.90 Increased By ▲ 3.98 (6.04%)
OGDC 187.21 Increased By ▲ 7.68 (4.28%)
PAEL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (2.74%)
PIBTL 7.26 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.54%)
PPL 149.90 Increased By ▲ 6.20 (4.31%)
PRL 25.10 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.21%)
PTC 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (4.7%)
SEARL 81.65 Increased By ▲ 3.08 (3.92%)
TELE 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.88%)
TOMCL 32.80 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (2.6%)
TPLP 8.41 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.44%)
TREET 16.55 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (2.6%)
TRG 56.20 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (2.82%)
UNITY 27.99 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.78%)
WTL 1.34 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.88%)
BR100 10,418 Increased By 329 (3.26%)
BR30 30,766 Increased By 1257 (4.26%)
KSE100 97,489 Increased By 2914.4 (3.08%)
KSE30 30,391 Increased By 945.7 (3.21%)

ISLAMABAD: Former law minister Farogh Naseem has submitted before the Supreme Court that the incorporation of Section 7 in the Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development [Government Control] Act, 1948 be treated as the stand-alone statute.

A five-judge bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, on Thursday, heard the presidential reference on the RekoDiq project.

The apex court has appointed advocates, Farogh Naseem, Salman Akram Raja, and Zahid Ibrahim as amicus curiae in this case.

Justice Ijaz asked the former law minister that you are saying that Section 7 incorporation in 1948 Act is the stand-alone law as it does not conflict with any provisions of the 1973 Constitution.

Farogh stated that the Act 1948 is the existing law at the time of the commencement of the 1973 Constitution. He said when it (Act 1948) is the existing law then it is neither federal nor of province but it was allocated to the federation, adding the law cannot be hybrid or concurrent.

Justice Bandial remarked that the Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Amendment Act, 2022 is not the complete law as the foot and head are borrowed from the Act 1948.

Farogh said the court should not say that the federation passed this law, adding that the situation is not conducive for it. He said if the federation does this then it would be incidental encroachment. The chief justice then said the Court does not make law and it will also not suggest changes in the existing one.

Earlier, during the proceeding, Justice Afridi inquired from advocate Salahuddin Ahmed, who is representing the Balochistan government that when the Balochistan provincial Assembly was on board then why an independent law was made, like that of the KP Assembly. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Assembly in 2017 had passed Mines and Minerals Act, 2017.

Justice Ijaz, sharing the same concern, also asked why not Balochistan have stand-alone law, and remarked whether there is any practical difficulty in this regard.

The counsel replied the assembly was on board; therefore, the Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development [Government Control] Act, 1948 was amended, through the incorporation of Section 7 in it. He said the Balochis-tan Assembly did not pass any resolution but after nine hours in-camera briefing passed Section 7. The federal government has come to “pre-emptive invocation” to seek the advice of the Supreme Court.

Justice Jamal remarked that the government uses this (Act 2022) for the time being but it should have stand-alone law. He said it takes only one week that the government can pass an independent law. The Balochistan counsel replied they are running under a tight time constraint.

At the end of the hearing, the chief justice asked the amicus curiae and the Balochistan government’s counsel to make a submission on Section 7, which is added in Act 1948 and the proposed Foreign Investment (Protection and Promotion) Bill, 2022.

The case was adjourned until Monday (Nov 21).

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.