AGL 38.86 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.99%)
AIRLINK 197.00 Decreased By ▼ -6.02 (-2.97%)
BOP 9.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-3.24%)
CNERGY 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-4.43%)
DCL 9.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.4%)
DFML 39.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-2.02%)
DGKC 97.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-0.94%)
FCCL 34.99 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.09%)
FFBL 85.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.13%)
FFL 13.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-2.73%)
HUBC 128.25 Decreased By ▼ -3.32 (-2.52%)
HUMNL 13.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.57%)
KEL 5.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-7.31%)
KOSM 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.79%)
MLCF 44.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-1.73%)
NBP 60.21 Decreased By ▼ -6.17 (-9.29%)
OGDC 215.00 Decreased By ▼ -5.76 (-2.61%)
PAEL 39.35 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.26%)
PIBTL 8.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-4.6%)
PPL 193.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.88 (-2.47%)
PRL 38.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
PTC 25.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
SEARL 103.50 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.44%)
TELE 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-4.1%)
TOMCL 36.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.07%)
TPLP 13.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 24.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.39%)
TRG 56.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-1.81%)
UNITY 33.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.25%)
WTL 1.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-5.85%)
BR100 11,717 Decreased By -172.7 (-1.45%)
BR30 36,449 Decreased By -907.1 (-2.43%)
KSE100 109,056 Decreased By -2014.6 (-1.81%)
KSE30 34,226 Decreased By -682.8 (-1.96%)

EDITORIAL: As India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru ordered his army chief Gen Sir Roy Bucher to “go ahead”, the latter asked Defence Minister Sardar Baldev Singh “to go ahead with what?” “Go ahead with the ceasefire”, replied the minister. That ceasefire led to peace in occupied Jammu and Kashmir which was on the verge of falling into Pakistan’s hands in the wake of an armed revolt against the Maharaja Hari Singh’s rule.

India had learnt the hard way that its so-called accession excuse was no more tenable. It moved out of the battlefield and went for diplomacy. Prime Minister Nehru met his Pakistani counterpart Liaquat Ali Khan in Karachi in August 1953 and “it was their firm opinion that this [Kashmir issue] should be settled in accordance with the wishes of the people of the State”. And they agreed that the “most feasible method of ascertaining the wishes of the people was by fair and impartial plebiscite”.

This led to the grant of special status to Jammu and Kashmir by the Indian constitution, which was revoked by India’s incumbent government in 2019. That Gen Bucher is authentic in his narration about Nehru wanting a ceasefire followed by a plebiscite the Indian leadership then and now don’t want the world to know is a grim reality.

So, the Bucher Papers, which tell the whole truth about the Kashmir question, have been classified as state secret by the Indian government. Since the classification as “sensitive” material enforced by India did not go beyond 25 years there are calls for declassification of the Bucher Papers. But that’s not acceptable to the Indian government. India doesn’t want the world to know that not the so-called accession but the Kashmiris freedom fight had actually led to the ceasefire and New Delhi’s agreement to concede autonomy to Kashmiris under Article 370.

The Bucher Papers have been kept at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML) as part of ‘India’s cultural history’, but these are inaccessible for glance by the public. Many have tried to read these papers, but that didn’t happen. An Indian activist, Venkatesh Nayak, filed multiple appeals to seek the documents from the NMML under the transparency law. The library advised Nayak to approach the foreign ministry and have its permission to declassify the Bucher Papers for academic research.

“Our view is that the papers need not remain ‘classified’ beyond the reach of academicians,” the NMML told him. When another activist approached the NMML he was informed that the foreign ministry was requested to declassify the Bucher Papers. But the ministry has rejected the request, because the papers contain “military operational matters in Kashmir and correspondences amongst senior government leaders on sensitive political matters on Kashmir”. This kind of approach to the Bucher Papers very much fits into the psyche of Modi’s mind who snatched whatever little autonomy was available to the Kashmiris under the revoked Article 370.

The said article was the byproduct of India’s defeat on the battlefront in Kashmir in 1948, and its revocation is denial of the truth Gen Sir Roy Bucher tells in his Bucher Papers. It is important to note that India’s Central Information Commission has observed in its order that the disclosure of files provided Gen Sir Roy Bucher to NMML, which may throw light on ‘accession’, is in ‘national interest’. Unfortunately, however, the commission has stopped short of ordering disclosure of these documents related to the period of 1947-49.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

TimeToMovveOn Feb 18, 2023 08:44am
Pakistan's project-Kashmir is over. The horse it dead. So kick it, bite it, scream it it. It does not matter.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ali Feb 18, 2023 09:44am
Prime Minister Nehru met his Pakistani counterpart Liaquat Ali Khan in Karachi in August 1953, The time of meeting is incorrect, to make the record correct, the PM Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated in 16 October, 1951.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
HashBrown® Feb 18, 2023 10:43pm
@TimeToMovveOn, "Pakistan's project-Kashmir is over. The horse it dead. So kick it, bite it, scream it it. It does not matter." That explains why you have over 700,000 soldiers stationed in the province right? That explains why it's currently the largest militarised occupied territory in the world? The Kashmir "project" may well have died had you people known how to govern with tolerance and compassion. But through your own savagery you've made it into an open wound that will never heal until the whole valley is free of you. Pakistan really doesn't have to lift a finger for that, you're managing it all by yourselves.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimeToMovveOn Feb 21, 2023 07:52am
@HashBrown®, Yes, the wound won't heal for the reasons you correctly say (savagery, etc). But, so what. These are the losses of partition which will never be perfect. Some people are going to get hurt. Always. Unfortunately, it happens to be Kashmiris. But in return for the small wound, the pride though for every Indian is that through deft foreign policy and Pak's mistakes, and of course savagery, India has made Kashmir unsurmountable for Pakistan. We one-upped on you again after Bangladesh. We live with tjat joy. Pakistan, on the other hand, as the great journalist Ayas Amir wrote in 1999 in Dawn, "has sacrificed its entire identity in the alter of Kashmir." So the question for Pak is not whether there is a small open wound for India, but how much of what Pakistan could have been -- has been lost in the pursuit of Kashmir. And how much you will continue to lose in a pursuit that will never materialize.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
HashBrown® Feb 21, 2023 10:35pm
@TimeToMovveOn, "We one-upped on you again after Bangladesh. We live with tjat joy." Who is this "we" then? Is it the minuscule percentage of well off Hindustanis like yourself, most of whom have shown their patriotic passion by seeking asylum overseas? Or is it the overwhelming number of Hindustanis who live well below the poverty line and don't even have access to adequate sanitation? Do you think their misery is alleviated by your subjugation of Kashmir? While you're thinking that over, bear this in mind too - you've only ever had control of just over half the province. The other half won its freedom thanks to Pakistani troops in 1947-8, and since that time they have been among the country's most passionate defenders. So perhaps not quite the stunning diplomatic victory you've conjured up in your head, buddy.
thumb_up Recommended (0)