AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 213.00 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (1.25%)
BOP 9.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.84%)
CNERGY 6.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.09%)
DCL 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.79%)
DFML 42.21 Increased By ▲ 3.84 (10.01%)
DGKC 94.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.92 (-3.01%)
FCCL 35.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-3.16%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 16.45 Increased By ▲ 1.50 (10.03%)
HUBC 127.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.19 (-2.44%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.83%)
KEL 5.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.73%)
KOSM 6.95 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.29%)
MLCF 43.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-3.97%)
NBP 58.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.15%)
OGDC 218.55 Decreased By ▼ -11.58 (-5.03%)
PAEL 38.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.99%)
PIBTL 8.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.2%)
PPL 190.90 Decreased By ▼ -9.45 (-4.72%)
PRL 37.87 Decreased By ▼ -1.01 (-2.6%)
PTC 26.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-2.16%)
SEARL 103.70 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.07%)
TELE 8.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.24%)
TOMCL 34.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-1.82%)
TPLP 12.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-3.99%)
TREET 25.39 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.52%)
TRG 70.53 Increased By ▲ 6.41 (10%)
UNITY 33.45 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-3.1%)
WTL 1.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.37%)
BR100 11,900 Decreased By -196.6 (-1.63%)
BR30 36,867 Decreased By -848.1 (-2.25%)
KSE100 110,428 Decreased By -1987 (-1.77%)
KSE30 34,765 Decreased By -743.3 (-2.09%)

EDITORIAL: It’s strange that US President Joe Biden chose to call his Chinese counterpart a “dictator” at a Democratic fundraiser immediately after US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken went through all the trouble of travelling to China and meeting Foreign Minister Qin Gang and President Xi Jinping. Blinken announced in Beijing that the US and China had made ‘progress toward steering relations back on track’.

It is important to note that Blinken is the first US Secretary of State to visit Beijing in five years. Washington, then, was expected to keep working on the thaw, especially since it came after Chinese state media said in very clear terms that bilateral relations had sunk to “the lowest point” since the establishment of diplomatic relations.

But then came this completely unnecessary provocation from the US President himself. Perhaps the fact that he was speaking at a fundraiser which usually have small audiences and very limited media representation, and that the 80-year-old president is trying to portray himself as a tough guy as he gears up for re-election, explains his choice of words.

That is probably why he’s been playing down the impact of his comments, saying, “I don’t think it’s had any real consequence,” even though the Chinese government reprimanded the US ambassador in Beijing just hours after the incident.

There’s no denying that the US and China are the two biggest powers of the 21st century; or that they are on a collision course sometime mid-century (according to most experts). That is why Blinken’s push was so valuable.

The Americans are understandably worried that China is on course to become the world’s largest economy in a matter of a few decades, if not years. And in the process it is forming alliances, in addition to Russia, and influencing world leaders, which is prompting some of them, for the first time, to bare their teeth at Washington.

The US has already lost its diplomatic hold over the Middle East, for example, where even after the Trump era’s success of getting some Arab states to recognise Israel, Beijing was able to snatch the initiative form Washington by brokering peace between Saudi Arabia and Iran and encouraging the formation of a joint regional maritime force that will drive American hegemony right out of the Arabian Sea.

It is also partnering with a host of other nations, including Russia and India, to trade oil out of the dollar, even encouraging the BRICS platform to float its own currency to break the dollar’s stranglehold over international trade.

All this follows the numerous waves of US-China economic and tariff wars that were also initiated by the Trump White House, of course, while military cooperation is still frozen, which only shows why it was so important to protect and build on what Blinken had achieved in China.

Instead, President Biden chose to play the strongman before donors to lubricate his re-election campaign. Such chest-thumping before a domestic audience is understandable, and doesn’t really violate the playbook, but you’d still expect a little more finesse from the leader of the free world and supreme commander of the most potent military machine on the planet when he’s talking about his country’s biggest, fast-growing rival.

Now there’s a good chance he’s undone some of the good work that took weeks and months of preparation.

It is precisely because of superpower hubris that the world is splitting into blocs again, a grim reminder of the Cold War that plagued much of the last century and caused so much unnecessary suffering and bloodshed.

Countries like Pakistan are especially worried given their close links to both Washington and Beijing. That is why the world’s biggest powers would do well to listen to their concerns, among others, and work to tone down rhetoric of confrontation instead of stoking it.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Az_Iz Jun 28, 2023 08:18am
China holds a big chunk of the US debt. Cheap goods made in China are one of the reasons, for improved living standards in the US , Europe and pretty much the whole world. Companies like Apple and others derive one of the biggest, and in some cases the biggest chunk of profits from China. China is one of the top three biggest trading partner for almost every country in the world. And so on. So, why go around issuing titles, to Chinese leaders?
thumb_up Recommended (0)