AIRLINK 204.45 Increased By ▲ 3.55 (1.77%)
BOP 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.59%)
CNERGY 6.91 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.44%)
FCCL 34.83 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (2.17%)
FFL 17.21 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.35%)
FLYNG 24.52 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (2%)
HUBC 137.40 Increased By ▲ 5.70 (4.33%)
HUMNL 13.82 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.44%)
KEL 4.91 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.08%)
KOSM 6.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 44.31 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (2.26%)
OGDC 221.91 Increased By ▲ 3.16 (1.44%)
PACE 7.09 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.58%)
PAEL 42.97 Increased By ▲ 1.43 (3.44%)
PIAHCLA 17.08 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
PIBTL 8.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.69%)
POWER 9.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.99%)
PPL 190.60 Increased By ▲ 3.48 (1.86%)
PRL 43.04 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (2.33%)
PTC 25.04 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
SEARL 106.41 Increased By ▲ 6.11 (6.09%)
SILK 1.02 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.99%)
SSGC 42.91 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (1.37%)
SYM 18.31 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.84%)
TELE 9.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.33%)
TPLP 13.11 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.39%)
TRG 68.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.32%)
WAVESAPP 10.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.49%)
WTL 1.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.54%)
YOUW 4.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.97%)
BR100 12,137 Increased By 188.4 (1.58%)
BR30 37,146 Increased By 778.3 (2.14%)
KSE100 115,272 Increased By 1435.3 (1.26%)
KSE30 36,311 Increased By 549.3 (1.54%)

LAHORE: A coal power producer has failed to stop the regulator from encashing performance bank guarantee, said sources.

According to details, Private Power and Infrastructure Board issued a notice of demand to a local bank for payment under the performance bank guarantee furnished by it on behalf of the energy producer for failure to achieve financial closing for the project by the date stipulated in the letter of support, which was extended for seven times.

The coal power producer approached the relevant forum for restraining the regulator from encashing the guarantee. However, the concerned bank honored the demand raised by the regulator and paid out the guaranteed amount.

The power producer made his last ditch effort by praying the relevant forum that the regulator should be directed to deposit the encashment amount in relevant forum account till the finality of his appeal.

He was of the view that the regulator has en-cashed the guarantee without justification, as his failure to achieve financial closing was due to a change in the policy of the regulator, leaving him into a situation akin to economic duress in choosing between abandoning his project development investment and risking forging ahead with the project, the imposition of transmission service charges as a condition to extension of the letter of support despite those charges not falling due under the terms of the power purchase agreement.

He also pleaded for being a victim of prejudice as one of his competitors was given a further extension of the letter of support without quadrupling the guaranteed sum.

Also, he said the demand notice by the regulator against him could not specify the ground for calling the guarantee, which, according to him, was required under the terms of the performance guarantee. However, since the bank had honored the demand of the regulator, therefore, the option of restraining the encashment of the guarantee became infructuous.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.