AIRLINK 155.85 Increased By ▲ 5.60 (3.73%)
BOP 9.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.48%)
CNERGY 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.89%)
CPHL 78.24 Increased By ▲ 7.11 (10%)
FCCL 47.00 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (2.82%)
FFL 14.50 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.12%)
FLYNG 40.87 Increased By ▲ 3.72 (10.01%)
HUBC 137.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.54%)
HUMNL 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.24%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.29%)
KOSM 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.6%)
MLCF 74.20 Increased By ▲ 4.55 (6.53%)
OGDC 218.20 Increased By ▲ 15.19 (7.48%)
PACE 5.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.97%)
PAEL 44.89 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.47%)
PIAHCLA 14.80 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (10.04%)
PIBTL 8.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
POWER 14.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.33%)
PPL 168.03 Increased By ▲ 15.28 (10%)
PRL 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.83 (6.77%)
PTC 19.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.83%)
SEARL 82.57 Increased By ▲ 7.51 (10.01%)
SSGC 32.07 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (5.29%)
SYM 14.20 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.79%)
TELE 7.01 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.45%)
TPLP 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.75%)
TRG 62.69 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.28%)
WAVESAPP 9.11 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.9%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.79%)
YOUW 3.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.68%)
AIRLINK 155.85 Increased By ▲ 5.60 (3.73%)
BOP 9.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.48%)
CNERGY 7.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.89%)
CPHL 78.24 Increased By ▲ 7.11 (10%)
FCCL 47.00 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (2.82%)
FFL 14.50 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.12%)
FLYNG 40.87 Increased By ▲ 3.72 (10.01%)
HUBC 137.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.54%)
HUMNL 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.24%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.29%)
KOSM 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.6%)
MLCF 74.20 Increased By ▲ 4.55 (6.53%)
OGDC 218.20 Increased By ▲ 15.19 (7.48%)
PACE 5.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.97%)
PAEL 44.89 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.47%)
PIAHCLA 14.80 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (10.04%)
PIBTL 8.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
POWER 14.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.33%)
PPL 168.03 Increased By ▲ 15.28 (10%)
PRL 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.83 (6.77%)
PTC 19.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.83%)
SEARL 82.57 Increased By ▲ 7.51 (10.01%)
SSGC 32.07 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (5.29%)
SYM 14.20 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.79%)
TELE 7.01 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.45%)
TPLP 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.75%)
TRG 62.69 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.28%)
WAVESAPP 9.11 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.9%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.79%)
YOUW 3.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.68%)
BR100 12,607 Increased By 204.6 (1.65%)
BR30 37,068 Increased By 1508.6 (4.24%)
KSE100 118,334 Increased By 1036.6 (0.88%)
KSE30 36,262 Increased By 423.3 (1.18%)

At last, the fiscal year that would go down in history as one of the gloomiest years for the economy and a particularly challenging year for the industry has come to an end. For cement manufacturers, despite a demand that remained subdued for much of the period, profitability did not. In 9MFY24, combined post-tax earnings grew 17 percent even as total volumes grew only 3 percent. This was possible despite a higher effective tax—36 percent vs last year’s 30 percent—as well as greater overheads and finance costs during the period.

With prices moving favorably up, after counting for the FED hikes, it is clear that cement companies will continue to perform well financially. In the full year, volumes are up by 1.6 percent in total; propelled mainly by exports (up 56%), as domestic offtake declined (down 5%). A serious recovery in demand was never expected which made it easier to not dwell on domestic demand, but focus on racking up sales to export markets and keeping prices looking up, with most companies toeing the industry line as much as possible. This is why despite a shortage of demand, and significantly reduced capacity utilization, companies were under no pressure to compete on sales or be in a hurry to enter price wars. Without any meaningful decline in prices throughout the year, the price per ton sold likely remained impressive for most cement companies. Based on the combined financials of 16 cement companies, revenue per ton sold in 9M rose 10 percent, which maintained a decent distance from cost per ton sold which rose 6 percent for the industry. Margins—as a result—were higher this year.

What does the coming year bring but less hope? Though business sentiments appear to have improved, the government’s expectations of signing on a new IMF loan may tighten the noose on expenditure and bring a fresh bout of inflation pushed by much higher taxes and upward revisions in energy prices. This will keep spending of all manners at bay. Cement manufacturers have made necessary investments in energy efficiency, created linkages in export-ready markets expanded volumes sent abroad to cover their fixed costs, and ensured they have a place in the local markets they operate—they won’t make windfall profits, but they will keep their cement kilns burning. One thing is for sure, they may be under demand pressure, but they are never underprepared.

Comments

Comments are closed.

Az_Iz Jul 05, 2024 05:25am
Capacity went up,just when demand went down and energy costs went up.Due to shrewd business tactics,this industry did great,without seeking subsidies from govt. Others should learn from them.
thumb_up Recommended (2)