AGL 40.25 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.55%)
AIRLINK 127.90 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.16%)
BOP 6.70 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.36%)
CNERGY 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.17%)
DCL 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.48%)
DFML 41.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.53%)
DGKC 86.35 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.65%)
FCCL 32.66 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.52%)
FFBL 65.00 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.51%)
FFL 11.61 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (10.05%)
HUBC 113.55 Increased By ▲ 2.78 (2.51%)
HUMNL 14.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.46%)
KEL 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.28%)
KOSM 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.61%)
MLCF 40.55 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.07%)
NBP 61.64 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.97%)
OGDC 196.50 Increased By ▲ 1.63 (0.84%)
PAEL 27.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PIBTL 7.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-5.89%)
PPL 155.00 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (1.62%)
PRL 26.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.68%)
PTC 16.30 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.25%)
SEARL 85.97 Increased By ▲ 1.83 (2.17%)
TELE 7.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.51%)
TOMCL 36.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.55%)
TPLP 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.19%)
TREET 16.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-5.44%)
TRG 62.45 Increased By ▲ 3.83 (6.53%)
UNITY 28.65 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (6.66%)
WTL 1.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.17%)
BR100 10,134 Increased By 134.2 (1.34%)
BR30 31,430 Increased By 427.6 (1.38%)
KSE100 95,171 Increased By 979.5 (1.04%)
KSE30 29,562 Increased By 361.1 (1.24%)

ISLAMABAD: In a recent development, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has dismissed the appeal filed by Eden Builders (Pvt) Ltd, upholding the decision of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) regarding misleading advertising claims about their housing project.

In 2018, the CCP imposed a penalty of PKR 2.5 million on Eden Builders for deceptive marketing campaigns related to their ‘Eden Life Islamabad’ project, violating Section 10 of the Competition Act, 2010.

The CCP determined that Eden Builders’ claims were misleading. Specifically, their advertisement featured an illegible disclaimer about additional development charges not included in the quoted price, which was held misleading and tantamount to an omission of material price related information, thus violating Section 10 of the Competition Act.

The allusion in the advertisement of approval by CDA was also held to be a false and misleading claim, as there was no such approval.

Eden Builders filed an appeal against the CCP’s order before CAT. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld CCP’s order regarding Eden Builders’ violations of Section 10 of the Act.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.