AGL 37.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 161.48 Increased By ▲ 6.26 (4.03%)
BOP 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.21%)
CNERGY 6.86 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.08%)
DCL 10.08 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (5.77%)
DFML 40.50 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.47%)
DGKC 91.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-1.13%)
FCCL 38.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.89%)
FFBL 78.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.29%)
FFL 13.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.03%)
HUBC 113.50 Increased By ▲ 3.31 (3%)
HUMNL 14.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.28%)
KEL 5.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.57%)
KOSM 8.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.72%)
MLCF 44.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.97%)
NBP 74.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.56%)
OGDC 192.01 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.07%)
PAEL 31.83 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (4.43%)
PIBTL 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.94%)
PPL 166.99 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (0.26%)
PRL 31.35 Increased By ▲ 1.91 (6.49%)
PTC 22.08 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (10.01%)
SEARL 97.30 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (0.7%)
TELE 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.78%)
TOMCL 34.75 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.43%)
TPLP 11.20 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (9.59%)
TREET 18.10 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (2.49%)
TRG 61.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.41%)
UNITY 32.15 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.56%)
WTL 1.53 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (4.08%)
BR100 11,239 Increased By 23.4 (0.21%)
BR30 33,901 Increased By 250.2 (0.74%)
KSE100 104,818 Increased By 258.9 (0.25%)
KSE30 32,436 Increased By 69.8 (0.22%)

LAHORE: Seeking record after selecting a group of taxpayers for audit is unlawful, said tax practitioners. They said the practice of doing so was rampant during the time of former Chairman FBR Dr Mohammed Ashfaq Ahmed when tax authorities were involved in selecting taxpayers for audit for various tax periods and calling upon them to produce record and documents for the purpose of audit.

According to them, not only the assessing officers but the competent authorities were also found issuing follow up notices, listing the record and documents required for the audit.

They said most of the notices were issued under sales tax and federal excise act without mentioning any scrutiny of tax returns. Rather, taxpayers were simply informed that they have been selected for audit in exercise of powers under the relevant laws. However, none of the notices has ever assigned reasons for selecting the taxpayers for audit.

According to these circles, most of such notices were challenged in the courts of law on the ground that issuance of notices calling upon to produce record and selecting them for audit at the same time was against the spirit of the law, as no reason was ever assigned to the action by the department.

They further pointed out that issuing notices without giving reasons for audit was arbitrary and amounts to mala fide as well as roving and fishing inquiry into their tax affairs. They said the department was issuing notices mechanically on or about the same time, which meant they were under pressure to do so.

According to the tax experts, the tax laws provide a safeguard to them when it stipulates that the tax authorities would have to give reasons for audit selection. Especially, when this selection was not through computer ballot but carried out manually by the competent authorities.

It may be noted that the authorities of the Inland Revenue Service were found sharing with media the kind of pressure they were facing at the hands of the FBR high-ups. They were also found suggesting the ill-fated taxpayers to approach the courts of law for a remedy against the audit notices.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.