AGL 40.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.27%)
AIRLINK 129.74 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.51%)
BOP 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
CNERGY 4.62 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (3.36%)
DCL 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
DFML 41.91 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (3.2%)
DGKC 83.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.13%)
FCCL 32.70 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.11%)
FFBL 75.47 Increased By ▲ 6.86 (10%)
FFL 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.32%)
HUBC 110.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-1.13%)
HUMNL 14.65 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (2.38%)
KEL 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
KOSM 8.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-6.35%)
MLCF 39.89 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.17%)
NBP 60.45 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 198.45 Increased By ▲ 3.51 (1.8%)
PAEL 26.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
PIBTL 7.71 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (3.07%)
PPL 158.00 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.43%)
PRL 26.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
PTC 18.40 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.55%)
SEARL 82.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1%)
TELE 8.34 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.34%)
TOMCL 34.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.29%)
TPLP 9.14 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.75%)
TREET 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.71%)
TRG 61.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.84%)
UNITY 27.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.33%)
WTL 1.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (7.03%)
BR100 10,400 Increased By 213 (2.09%)
BR30 31,653 Increased By 316.8 (1.01%)
KSE100 97,328 Increased By 1781.9 (1.86%)
KSE30 30,192 Increased By 614.4 (2.08%)

LAHORE: An Additional District & Sessions Judge Lahore has held that an application under section 22-A of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction in a matter of wrong posting of the NTN Number in Sales Tax Return is not maintainable nor the Sessions Court has jurisdiction to pass any direction in this regard.

The court gave this ruling while dismissing an application under section 22-A CrPC moved by a citizen Zafar Iqbal Bhatti. The court observed that the petition was devoid of jurisdiction and maintainability.

The petitioner Zafar visited his Tax Expert on 27.07.24 for submission of his income tax return for the period 2023-24 and found that one Dr Riaz had posted/processed five transactions against his NTN number of valuing Rs1913315.00 for which FBR demanded sales tax from him whereas he neither dealt in medicine nor met any representative of said company and even did not visit Ferozpur road, Lahore.

He submitted that the respondent company had committed fraud with him by preparing fake documents and showing fake entries against his NTN number. His counsel Nadeem Haider contended that the respondent had committed fraud with his client however, representing the respondent company advocate Jalilur Rehman argued that it was a case of unintentional error or omission in posting the NTN number for which a revision had already been submitted to the FBR Department for correction of the NTN number. He further contended that the petition was not maintainable and prayed to dismiss the same.

The court while agreeing with the contentions of the counsel of the respondent company Jalilur Rehman dismissed the petition.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.