AIRLINK 195.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.47 (-1.25%)
BOP 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.89%)
CNERGY 7.44 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.06%)
FCCL 38.10 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (5.83%)
FFL 16.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-2.37%)
FLYNG 27.54 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (9.98%)
HUBC 131.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.13 (-1.59%)
HUMNL 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.7%)
KEL 4.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.67%)
KOSM 6.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.03%)
MLCF 45.55 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.27%)
OGDC 214.17 Decreased By ▼ -4.06 (-1.86%)
PACE 6.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.43%)
PAEL 40.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-3.31%)
PIAHCLA 16.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.59%)
PIBTL 8.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.3%)
POWER 9.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.11%)
PPL 182.19 Decreased By ▼ -3.74 (-2.01%)
PRL 41.83 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (1.36%)
PTC 24.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.57%)
SEARL 102.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.30 (-2.2%)
SILK 1.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.99%)
SSGC 39.58 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-3.25%)
SYM 17.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-3.88%)
TELE 8.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.35%)
TPLP 12.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.86%)
TRG 65.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.09 (-1.64%)
WAVESAPP 11.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.5%)
WTL 1.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.37%)
YOUW 3.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.5%)
BR100 11,989 Decreased By -119.9 (-0.99%)
BR30 36,209 Decreased By -388.9 (-1.06%)
KSE100 113,486 Decreased By -1556 (-1.35%)
KSE30 35,640 Decreased By -559.3 (-1.55%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled ‘Xinjiang, Balochistan and FATA’ to the Editor carried by this newspaper yesterday.

In my view, to counter the Baloch insurgency and integrate the Baloch people into the national mainstream, the government only had to adopt a holistic approach to address the root causes of the conflict, including economic marginalization, political exclusion, and cultural grievances by investing in local development, ensuring fair resource distribution, and enhancing political representation while granting greater administrative autonomy to Balochistan.

On the contrary, the government response to deal with insurgency in Balochistan is normally perceived exactly the opposite.

The propaganda war has inculcated the impression albeit without any conclusive evidence that the response of Pakistan’s government included military operations, targeted killings, enforced disappearances.

The media is rife with reports that tens of thousands of people, including insurgents, civilians, and security personnel, have been killed in the ongoing conflict making this conflict as one of Pakistan’s deadliest.

Similarly the response of the Government to erstwhile FATA is perceived primarily kinetic. Reportedly, the Pakistani government has conducted numerous military operations (e.g., Operation Zarb-e-Azb) to dismantle militant networks. The insurgency and counter-insurgency operations have led to tens of thousands of deaths, including militants, security forces, and civilians.

Displacement and destruction of infrastructure have also been significant. Contrastingly, in Xinjiang, the Chinese government primarily pursued the policy of development which worked like magic.

The region has purposefully made a lynchpin of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). During the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020), China invested over $100 billion in Xinjiang’s development.

The substantial investment has also been made in infrastructure, industry, IT, and modern agriculture, as part of its broader strategy to integrate the region more closely with the rest of the country and to address the underlying economic disparities that contribute to unrest.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.