AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has rejected an order passed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) and ruled that refund cannot be blocked due to pendency of any tax reference before the high court.

It is reliably learnt that a landmark order has been passed by IHC and ruled that merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal.

IHC order stated, “Contention that because a tax reference has been pending against the refund order passed by the Tribunal, wherein no injunctive order has been issued, a refund has not been processed.

FTO orders’ implementation: IHC issues show cause notice to CIR for filing false statements

He has failed to adduce any provision of law or any case law, which establishes that the filing of a reference creating sufficient cause for the tax department to defy an order of the Tribunal which is in the field. Grievance emanates from the order of the FTO, who chose not to proceed further on grounds of maladministration pursuant to order given that the matter was subjudice. This is also insufficient basis for the question of maintainability of the petition.

The Tribunal’s order directed the tax authorities to process a refund that is in the field and has not been complied with. Merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal, IHC order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

T Sep 09, 2024 09:14am
fto, fbr and the courts all wandering clueless on modern rules of business, no wonder pakistan looks like a lost buffalo in arbitrations.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Faiz Jalib Sep 09, 2024 11:43am
Every official: My is the law of the land. "Too many applications hence the delay". Instead of honouring their commitments and working towards halal rozi, they come up with the flimsiest of excuses
thumb_up Recommended (0)