AGL 38.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.1%)
AIRLINK 213.15 Increased By ▲ 5.38 (2.59%)
BOP 10.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-6.36%)
DCL 9.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.1%)
DFML 40.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.84 (-2.04%)
DGKC 100.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.26 (-3.15%)
FCCL 35.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.1%)
FFBL 90.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.54 (-1.68%)
FFL 14.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-2.74%)
HUBC 136.15 Decreased By ▼ -3.28 (-2.35%)
HUMNL 14.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
KEL 5.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.52%)
KOSM 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-6.23%)
MLCF 46.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-2.58%)
NBP 66.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.38 (-10.01%)
OGDC 220.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.68 (-0.75%)
PAEL 38.40 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.76%)
PIBTL 8.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.34%)
PPL 202.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.35 (-1.63%)
PRL 39.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.33%)
PTC 26.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.58%)
SEARL 106.50 Decreased By ▼ -3.74 (-3.39%)
TELE 9.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.33%)
TOMCL 37.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.28%)
TPLP 13.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.07%)
TREET 25.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.08%)
TRG 59.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-2.23%)
UNITY 33.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-1.87%)
WTL 1.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-5.85%)
BR100 12,110 Decreased By -188.5 (-1.53%)
BR30 38,090 Decreased By -787.1 (-2.02%)
KSE100 112,891 Decreased By -1969.8 (-1.71%)
KSE30 35,544 Decreased By -651.6 (-1.8%)

This is apropos two back-to-back letters by this writer to Editor titled ‘Overcapacity dilemma: mismanagement or misjudgment?’ carried by the newspaper yesterday and Wednesday. Having said all this in my two previous letters to the Editor, a billion-dollar question remained unanswered: Why did Pakistan’s policy makers choose to install IPPs with double the capacity needed, while developed countries like the USA, Germany, and China maintain only a 20% reserve capacity.

This decision appears to stem from a short-sighted vision, plagued by sluggish and inefficient decision-making processes. Furthermore, inherent dishonesty and vested interests have often placed personal gains over national interests, leading to decisions that prioritize immediate benefits rather than long-term sustainability for the country.

It is high time that our political leadership clearly distinguish those power plants which are producing almost negligible electricity but enjoying the payment based upon capacity and those who are producing electricity as par with their capacity payment.

This is high time that our analysts, anchorpersons and civil society should change gear and be thankful to IPPs. We should admit our own mistakes and hold all those accountable who took imprudent decisions. Instead of advocating breaching agreements and pursuing legal action against IPPs, they should urge the government to engage with them respectfully, acknowledging their role in alleviating energy crises.

Moreover, the government should take decisive action to mitigate circular debt in the energy sector. Pakistan should introduce a performance-based payment system, prioritizing performance based payment systems. Besides, revising tariff structures to reflect the true cost of electricity, investing in energy efficiency through grid modernization, and enhancing governance to prevent corruption and mismanagement are crucial steps. These measures would reduce financial leakages and ensure a more sustainable and efficient energy sector.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.