AIRLINK 186.55 Decreased By ▼ -2.81 (-1.48%)
BOP 11.49 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.51%)
CNERGY 7.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.37%)
FCCL 37.12 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.28%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.07%)
FLYNG 26.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.53%)
HUBC 132.48 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (1.21%)
HUMNL 13.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.3%)
KEL 4.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.23%)
KOSM 6.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.49%)
MLCF 45.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.87%)
OGDC 200.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-0.53%)
PACE 6.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.33%)
PAEL 37.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.02%)
PIAHCLA 17.26 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (3.17%)
PIBTL 7.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.39%)
POWER 10.35 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (4.97%)
PPL 171.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.86 (-1.07%)
PRL 33.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-2.68%)
PTC 23.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.46%)
SEARL 97.85 Decreased By ▼ -3.89 (-3.82%)
SILK 1.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 31.38 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-4.04%)
SYM 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.5%)
TELE 8.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.98%)
TPLP 11.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.66%)
TRG 63.65 Decreased By ▼ -3.75 (-5.56%)
WAVESAPP 11.90 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.85%)
WTL 1.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-1.97%)
YOUW 3.90 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 11,776 Decreased By -43.5 (-0.37%)
BR30 34,721 Decreased By -278.4 (-0.8%)
KSE100 111,927 Decreased By -157.9 (-0.14%)
KSE30 34,883 Decreased By -62.9 (-0.18%)

LAHORE: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has held that reissuing show-cause notices after 19 years, without incriminating evidence, would be a blatant violation of the law and previous orders.

In a landmark case, the FTO decided the matter in favor of a commercial importer/exporter who had been embroiled in a nearly two-decade-long dispute with tax authorities.

The dispute centered on the importer’s refund claims for zero-rated supplies, which were repeatedly delayed and obstructed by tax authorities. The tax authorities proceeded against the importer alleging him of using fake/flying invoices while the taxpayer tried his level best to satisfy the authorities.

The importer approached the office of FTO and filed a complaint against the authorities for issuing show-cause notice to him (claimant/importer) in present matter which remained unresolved for about two decades with series/rounds of litigations, even in presence of order in his favour having been duly passed by the Commissioner (Appeal) and the Department neither filed second appeal nor sanctioned him the refund amount.

The FTO maintained that the case of the complainant had been mishandled badly by the department due to rapid changes in the jurisdiction and transfer/posting of the officers from one place to another.

Situation of the present matter had reached a stage where the department would have no choice other than to give effect to the order of the Commissioner Appeals as the same (order) had attained finality and department’s representation before the President against the FTO order had also been rejected.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.