AIRLINK 197.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.14%)
BOP 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
CNERGY 7.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.69%)
FCCL 36.62 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.72%)
FFL 16.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.06%)
FLYNG 25.80 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (3.04%)
HUBC 135.00 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (0.72%)
HUMNL 14.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
KEL 4.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.63%)
KOSM 6.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.02%)
MLCF 45.60 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.38%)
OGDC 216.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-0.7%)
PACE 6.95 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.14%)
PAEL 40.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-1.76%)
PIAHCLA 17.00 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.83%)
PIBTL 8.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.71%)
POWER 9.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.64%)
PPL 184.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.53%)
PRL 41.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.05%)
PTC 24.86 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.36%)
SEARL 103.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-0.76%)
SILK 1.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.25%)
SYM 17.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.55%)
TELE 8.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.91%)
TPLP 12.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.95%)
TRG 66.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.68%)
WAVESAPP 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.33%)
WTL 1.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.12%)
YOUW 3.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.5%)
BR100 12,086 Decreased By -23.5 (-0.19%)
BR30 36,528 Decreased By -69.8 (-0.19%)
KSE100 114,670 Decreased By -372.1 (-0.32%)
KSE30 36,066 Decreased By -133.3 (-0.37%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought replies from the provincial government and others by September 30 on a petition challenging the Punjab Defamation Act 2024.

The court has already linked any proceedings under the Defamation Act till the final decision on the petition.

The petitioner President of a journalist union through its counsel argued that the defamation law was against basic human rights and the Constitution.

He claimed that the government made the law to suppress freedom of expression and to avoid public criticism.

He asked the court to declare the impugned law unconstitutional.

During the previous hearing, Advocate General Punjab (AGP) told the court that no proceedings had so far been started under the impugned law.

He also clarified that neither tribunals had been formed nor rules established under the law. He was of the view that no aggrieved party had so far filed a petition.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.