AGL 37.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.05%)
AIRLINK 128.55 Increased By ▲ 3.48 (2.78%)
BOP 7.85 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (14.6%)
CNERGY 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (4.04%)
DCL 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (7.46%)
DFML 38.41 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.87%)
DGKC 81.00 Increased By ▲ 3.23 (4.15%)
FCCL 32.60 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (6.61%)
FFBL 74.23 Increased By ▲ 5.37 (7.8%)
FFL 12.40 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4.55%)
HUBC 109.10 Increased By ▲ 4.60 (4.4%)
HUMNL 13.80 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.3%)
KEL 4.96 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (6.67%)
KOSM 7.64 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (6.56%)
MLCF 38.26 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (4.99%)
NBP 72.00 Increased By ▲ 6.08 (9.22%)
OGDC 185.50 Increased By ▲ 5.97 (3.33%)
PAEL 25.22 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (3.23%)
PIBTL 7.30 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.1%)
PPL 150.00 Increased By ▲ 6.30 (4.38%)
PRL 25.22 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (3.7%)
PTC 17.20 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (4.88%)
SEARL 81.75 Increased By ▲ 3.18 (4.05%)
TELE 7.54 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.43%)
TOMCL 32.56 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.85%)
TPLP 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.94%)
TREET 16.29 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.99%)
TRG 55.60 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (1.72%)
UNITY 28.35 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.09%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.1%)
BR100 10,516 Increased By 427 (4.23%)
BR30 30,916 Increased By 1407.5 (4.77%)
KSE100 98,135 Increased By 3560.4 (3.76%)
KSE30 30,591 Increased By 1146.1 (3.89%)

This is apropos letters to the Editor by this writer titled ‘Trump’s bureaucracy cuts: a daunting task’ carried by the newspaper in recent days.

I would like to conclude my argument by saying, among other things, that in a hypothetical scenario, if the civil and military bureaucracy is reduced by 77 percent, it would generate savings of approximately USD 815.24 billion, and economic growth would add another $260 billion, the total additional funds available would be USD 1,075.24 billion annually.

If this amount is used to reduce taxes for the common people, it could result in a tax reduction of approximately $3,239 per person annually, significantly easing the financial burden on households across the United States, besides the higher growth rate would amplify the benefits of deregulation and tax cuts, driving economic dynamism, fostering business expansion, and enhancing government revenue through increased overall economic activity.

Though the concept looks great on paper, reducing bureaucracy would promise cost savings, improved efficiency, and enhanced self-governance, its practical implementation most likely would face some significant challenges.

Political resistance from entrenched interests, legislative hurdles, and opposition from the bureaucracy itself could impede progress. Downsizing risks substantial job losses, economic disruption, and potential service gaps in critical public functions, including national security.

Administrative complexities, such as restructuring workflows and maintaining morale among remaining employees, add further difficulties to the task.

The anticipated economic growth from deregulation and tax reductions may not materialize quickly, and regional economies dependent on federal jobs could suffer.

Legal and ethical concerns, including labor lawsuits and equity issues, also pose significant risks. To succeed, such reforms would require a phased, strategic approach, stakeholder engagement, and meticulous planning to avoid unintended consequences and ensure sustainable outcomes.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former press minister to Embassy of Pakistan to France

Comments

200 characters