AIRLINK 221.50 Increased By ▲ 3.52 (1.61%)
BOP 10.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.19%)
CNERGY 7.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.19%)
FCCL 36.29 Increased By ▲ 1.46 (4.19%)
FFL 19.50 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.93%)
FLYNG 26.80 Increased By ▲ 1.65 (6.56%)
HUBC 131.65 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.43%)
HUMNL 14.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.48%)
KEL 5.21 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.58%)
KOSM 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.9%)
MLCF 46.99 Increased By ▲ 1.36 (2.98%)
OGDC 220.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-0.85%)
PACE 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.23%)
PAEL 44.65 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.04%)
PIAHCLA 17.82 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.73%)
PIBTL 9.06 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1%)
POWERPS 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-3.84%)
PPL 195.00 Increased By ▲ 1.99 (1.03%)
PRL 41.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-2.83%)
PTC 26.92 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.09%)
SEARL 109.43 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (2.19%)
SILK 1.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 46.48 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (3.29%)
SYM 21.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.19%)
TELE 10.41 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.56%)
TPLP 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.38%)
TRG 67.99 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.06%)
WAVESAPP 11.75 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (4.07%)
WTL 1.77 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (4.12%)
YOUW 4.33 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.88%)
BR100 12,495 Increased By 98 (0.79%)
BR30 37,635 Increased By 287.9 (0.77%)
KSE100 118,248 Increased By 661 (0.56%)
KSE30 37,336 Increased By 271.3 (0.73%)

LAHORE: The importers of Cocoa Powder have failed to claim exemption under two different notifications simultaneously. According to details, the importers had claimed exemption from customs duty in terms of SRO 1261, which was neither disputed nor denied by the department.

However, at the same time, the importers were also entitled to exemption from additional customs duty in terms of serial No. 3(vi) of SRO 967 read with serial No.2, chapter VII, Part-II, table-B of fifth schedule to the Customs Act, 1969.

But the department was of the view that the importers cannot claim exemption under two different notifications/SROs simultaneously. The department pointed out that additional customs duty was levied pursuant to SRO 967(I)/2022 on all goods, therefore, the importers could not claim benefit of this SRO for its peculiar enforcement.

Since importers were aggrieved of levy of additional customs duty on importing Cocoa Powder, therefore, they challenged the departmental order. The importers also referred to a letter from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) holding that an importer can claim the benefit of more than one notification at a time, therefore, they should be allowed for the same.

But the department took the plea that the importers are not entitled to exemption from additional customs duty in terms of SRO 967, as the same is available only to such important, which are chargeable to the customs duty under the fifth schedule of the Act while the department has charged them under the first schedule to the Act. According to the department, it was not a case of claiming of exemption under two different notifications/SROs simultaneously, rather the porters were otherwise not entitled to claim any exemption under SRO 967.

The relevant appellate forum maintained that the argument that the importers claim for exemption under two different SROs has been denied in violation of FBR’s letter is misconceived because they are not entitled for any exemption pursuant to serial No.3 of SRO 967.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

200 characters