AIRLINK 221.40 Increased By ▲ 3.42 (1.57%)
BOP 10.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 7.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.46%)
FCCL 36.18 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (3.88%)
FFL 19.39 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.36%)
FLYNG 26.80 Increased By ▲ 1.65 (6.56%)
HUBC 131.47 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.29%)
HUMNL 14.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.37%)
KEL 5.25 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.35%)
KOSM 7.50 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.9%)
MLCF 46.90 Increased By ▲ 1.27 (2.78%)
OGDC 221.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-0.33%)
PACE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.72%)
PAEL 44.80 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.38%)
PIAHCLA 17.90 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.19%)
PIBTL 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.89%)
POWERPS 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-3.84%)
PPL 195.49 Increased By ▲ 2.48 (1.28%)
PRL 41.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-2.94%)
PTC 26.85 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.83%)
SEARL 109.50 Increased By ▲ 2.42 (2.26%)
SILK 1.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 46.38 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (3.07%)
SYM 21.24 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.24%)
TELE 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.46%)
TPLP 14.70 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.31%)
TRG 67.90 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.92%)
WAVESAPP 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.63%)
WTL 1.76 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (3.53%)
YOUW 4.31 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.41%)
BR100 12,495 Increased By 98 (0.79%)
BR30 37,635 Increased By 287.9 (0.77%)
KSE100 118,025 Increased By 438.4 (0.37%)
KSE30 37,273 Increased By 207.5 (0.56%)

The GDP provisionally grew by a meager 0.92 percent in the 1QFY25. The figures have a flavor of Dar’s recipe where the sectors falling in the informal economy are growing higher than those where there is more formality and have published numbers. If the Pakistan economy grows at 3 percent (an optimistic target) in FY25, its three-year rolling average growth would be at 1.8 percent – the lowest since FY52.

This sums up the stability mantra where the inflation and interest rates are falling due to suppression in the demand while the growth and employment opportunities are simply missing.

The worst performance is in the important crops and the report from rural communities is bad where the deterioration in the farm income has a widespread impact on the economic demand from the rural sector and that is adversely impacting the manufacturing and services sector.

The important crop growth contracted by 11.2 percent; however, agriculture still posted a growth of 1.15 percent. The compensation comes from 4.9 percent growth in livestock and 2.1 percent growth in other crops. The data of important crops is visible, and the decline was expected –cotton production is down by 29.6 percent while sugarcane is down by 2.2 percent. The story of maize and rice is not encouraging either while the wheat outlook is meager as well. One may wonder what magic is in other crops, which are showing growth.

One of the top performers in the 1Q is livestock –it grew by 4.9 percent. This has more than 50 percent of agriculture weight and over 10 percent of overall GDP, and yet, there is no high-powered data collection. The sector mostly operates informally, and it is hard to assess the growth due to a lack of published data. And it’s counterintuitive to see higher growth in the livestock sector, and the overall economy is slowing down.

The industrial sector contraction continued, further dipping by 4.4 percent in the 1QFY25. Almost every sub-sector is negative apart from small-scale manufacturing (SSM) and slaughtering. Interestingly, like other growth areas, data visibility is low in these two. It’s ironic to find SSM growing at almost double digits (9.7%) when the LSM growth is still in red. The smaller industries usually feed to larger ones in the value chain. Their continued growth when the LSM is in negative defies logic.

The electricity, gas, and water supply sector’s sharp decline is finally arrested, as it has almost shrank by one-third last year, it’s up by a mere 0.6 percent in 1QFY25. These statistics self-depict the health of the energy sector.

The services sector, which relies on activities in the other two segments, is up by 1.4 percent in the 1QFY25. Notable growth is in Human health and social work (5.6%) food and accommodation (4.6%), information and communication (5.2%), and real estate activities (4.2%). The pickup in food and accommodation and ICT is intuitive, which is visible from jampacked hotels and restaurants, and constantly growing ICT exports. However, growth in real estate activities doesn’t make sense when the construction is sharply down.

In a nutshell, the overall economic activities are low, and the challenge remains to turn stability into growth.

Comments

200 characters
KU Jan 01, 2025 11:24am
Apparent that govt has interest in their own benefits, country can go survive on loans. Many economists had n still doubt false stability claims, look around, do we see any building blocks for growth?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Nasim Beg Jan 01, 2025 12:45pm
A good reality check
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Dr Altaf Baloch Jan 01, 2025 01:02pm
0.92% of growth meanwhile 2.55% of population growth.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Anas Jan 01, 2025 09:06pm
@KU, loans and dont forget remittances
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply